updated 2026-11-11 00:08 UTC

MCP Dev Latam

Repository Website

Open-source MCP servers for Latin American commerce — Pix, NF-e, banking, fiscal, logistics, and messaging across Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Colombia, Chile, and Peru. MIT, on npm.

MCP Servers TypeScript Listed MIT

Is MCP Dev Latam safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 94%
Last push 45d ago
Compare MCP Dev Latam

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: MCP Dev Latam scores 51.8/100 (Grade C), ranked #963 of 1387 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.6/10; 94% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-27. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How MCP Dev Latam could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Already done? Suggest a correctionAdd the trust badge

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships MCP Dev Latam and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Signed

    github.com/codespar/mcp-dev-latam, MIT, last pushed 2026-09-27. 94% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature, so changes trace to a verified account.

  2. Review and release Mixed

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 4.6/10 (scanned Nov 9, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review1
    • Branch Protection3
    • Signed Releasesn/a
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions0
    • Pinned Dependencies0
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 3
    CI-Tests 9
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 1
    Contributors 10
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 0
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 10
    Packaging 10
    Pinned-Dependencies 0
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 10
    Signed-Releases -1
    Token-Permissions 0
    Vulnerabilities 0

  3. Published packages Not linked

    Without a build attestation, nothing proves the published files were built from this repository.

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-08-29 OSSF Scorecard: 4.6/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues MCP Dev Latam’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

Signed credential (JSON) How to verify

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How MCP Dev Latam compares in MCP Servers

  1. #540 Lumino MCP Server 51.9 +0.1
  2. #541 Codex MCP Go 51.9 +0.1
  3. #542 MCP Dev Latam 51.8 this agent
  4. #543 Cross Code Organizer 51.5 −0.3
  5. #544 JADX MCP Server 51.5 −0.3

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks MCP Dev Latam’s 51.8.

Where the 51.8 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

51.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

MCP Dev Latam MCP Servers average (779 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
10.4 / 25
in line with avg 10.8
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.9 below avg 13.7
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.4 / 17
in line with avg 12.3
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
9.0 / 20
3.3 below avg 12.3
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
8.2 / 20
0.6 above avg 7.6

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-11-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#932 → #954)
2026-10-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 52 spots (#866 → #918)
2026-10-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 42 spots (#908 → #866)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.6/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 45 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
Compare with another agent
View MCP Servers Report missing data
41.6
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#542
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-11-11 00:08 UTC · Repo last pushed 45 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-11-10

Activity & Reach

Stars
277
Forks
52
Last Push
2026-09-27
45 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
60
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
14
Rank Change
▼3
was #960

Analysis

Activity Inputs

41.6 / 100
StarsRepository reach
14.7 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
18.8 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
8.0 / 20

Common questions about MCP Dev Latam

Public trust evidence for MCP Dev Latam is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does MCP Dev Latam publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for MCP Dev Latam. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does MCP Dev Latam have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
MCP Dev Latam has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.6/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is MCP Dev Latam actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 45 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does MCP Dev Latam use?
MCP Dev Latam ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are MCP Dev Latam's commits signed?
94% of the last 100 commits to MCP Dev Latam are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
MCP Dev Latam appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
low confidence
Unknown
Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to MCP Dev Latam's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain MCP Dev Latam?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores MCP Dev Latam from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 30HVTrust 3Grade 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1Listed 1MCP 1Surface 1
2026-11-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#932 → #954)
2026-10-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 52 spots (#866 → #918)
2026-10-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 42 spots (#908 → #866)
2026-10-22
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#895 → #906)
2026-10-18
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#865 → #879)
2026-10-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#835 → #847)
2026-10-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#821 → #833)
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#802 → #814)
2026-10-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#792 → #803)
2026-10-06
Rank Moved
Rank rose 15 spots (#807 → #792)
2026-10-05
Rank Moved
Rank rose 15 spots (#822 → #807)
2026-09-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#787 → #801)
2026-09-27
Rank Moved
Rank rose 30 spots (#817 → #787)
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 147 spots (#955 → #808)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 28.5pts (25.7 → 54.2)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #955
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-20
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#784 → #800)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 46 spots (#724 → #770)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 41 spots (#669 → #710)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 53 spots (#616 → #669)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank rose 49 spots (#665 → #616)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 79 spots (#586 → #665)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#564 → #586)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 29 spots (#535 → #564)
2026-09-02
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank rose 450 spots (#985 → #535)
2026-09-02
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 18.4pts (37.6 → 56.0)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 43 spots (#942 → #985)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 34 spots (#908 → #942)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 41 spots (#867 → #908)
2026-08-29
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.6/10
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank rose 338 spots (#1205 → #867)
2026-08-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 18.7pts (19.0 → 37.7)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 44 spots (#1148 → #1192)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#1125 → #1148)
2026-08-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#1111 → #1125)
GitHub → Website → npm: @codespar/mcp-adyen

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 51.8 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-dev-latam.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-dev-latam)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-dev-latam"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-dev-latam.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON