MCP As A Judge
MCP as a Judge is a behavioral MCP that strengthens AI coding assistants by requiring explicit LLM evaluations
Is MCP As A Judge safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
Compare MCP As A Judge
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: MCP As A Judge scores 35.6/100 (Grade D), ranked #1232 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 2.8/10; 13% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2025-12-15. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How MCP As A Judge compares in MCP Servers
- #732 Bigquery MCP 36.0 +0.4
- #733 Flowbite MCP 35.7 +0.1
- #734 MCP As A Judge 35.6 this agent
- #735 Antrieb MCP Server 35.6 ±0
- #736 SignNow Api Helper MCP 35.4 −0.2
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks MCP As A Judge’s 35.6.
Where the 35.6 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
35.6 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceMCP As A Judge MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
12.2 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about MCP As A Judge
Does MCP As A Judge publish package provenance?
Does MCP As A Judge have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is MCP As A Judge actively maintained?
What license does MCP As A Judge use?
Are MCP As A Judge's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to MCP As A Judge's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain MCP As A Judge?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores MCP As A Judge from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-as-a-judge)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-as-a-judge"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-as-a-judge.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON