Lotus Wisdom
Contemplative reasoning MCP server — Lotus Sutra wisdom framework with interactive ext-apps journey visualization.
Is Lotus Wisdom safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
Compare Lotus Wisdom
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
- Obsidian Sync MCP +0.2 higher
- Brandsystem MCP — Brand Guidelines for AI +0.1 higher
- MikroMCP 0.1 lower
In detail: Lotus Wisdom scores 73.1/100 (Grade B), ranked #263 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.8/10; 9% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-21. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How Lotus Wisdom compares in MCP Servers
- #155 Obsidian Sync MCP 73.3 +0.2
- #156 Brandsystem MCP — Brand Guidelines for AI 73.2 +0.1
- #157 Lotus Wisdom 73.1 this agent
- #158 MikroMCP 73.0 −0.1
- #159 Telegram (mcp-telegram) 72.9 −0.2
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Lotus Wisdom’s 73.1.
Where the 73.1 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
73.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceLotus Wisdom MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
51.0 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about Lotus Wisdom
Does Lotus Wisdom publish package provenance?
Does Lotus Wisdom have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Lotus Wisdom actively maintained?
What license does Lotus Wisdom use?
Are Lotus Wisdom's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to Lotus Wisdom's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain Lotus Wisdom?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Lotus Wisdom from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/lotus-wisdom)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/lotus-wisdom"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/lotus-wisdom.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON