IT Glue
MCP server for IT Glue — documentation, passwords, configurations, and flexible asset tools for AI assistants
Is IT Glue safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
Compare IT Glue
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: IT Glue scores 51.6/100 (Grade C), ranked #896 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.2/10; 71% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-23. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How IT Glue compares in MCP Servers
- #507 OSS Snowflake MCP Server 51.7 +0.1
- #508 Codex MCP Go 51.7 +0.1
- #509 IT Glue 51.6 this agent
- #510 Brainstorm MCP 51.6 ±0
- #511 Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange 51.5 −0.1
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks IT Glue’s 51.6.
Where the 51.6 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
51.6 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceIT Glue MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
51.7 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about IT Glue
Does IT Glue publish package provenance?
Does IT Glue have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is IT Glue actively maintained?
What license does IT Glue use?
Are IT Glue's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to IT Glue's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain IT Glue?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores IT Glue from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/it-glue)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/it-glue"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/it-glue.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON