updated 2026-09-04 13:03 UTC

iOS Simulator MCP

joshuayoes/ios-simulator-mcp

MCP server for interacting with the iOS simulator

MCP Servers JavaScript Grade C Listed MIT
54.1/100
Rank #640 of 1320
Compare iOS Simulator MCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-13 · 22d ago
Recent change
Rank +4

Is iOS Simulator MCP safe? iOS Simulator MCP scores 54.1/100 (Grade C), ranked #640 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.4/10; 92% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-13. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#309 MCP AutoMem — 54.2 (C) → #310 Exa MCP Server — 54.1 (C) → #312 DaVinci Resolve MCP — 54.1 (C) → #313 Outlook MCP — 54.0 (C) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Expose more independent signals, such as package metadata, provenance, or public usage evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 39 spots (#592 → #631)
2026-09-02
Grade Changed
Trust grade A → C
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 502 spots (#90 → #592)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.4/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for iOS Simulator MCP View MCP Servers Report missing data
62.7
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#311
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-04 13:03 UTC · Repo last pushed 22 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-04

Activity & Reach

Stars
2.2k
Forks
97
Last Push
2026-08-13
22 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
7
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
16
Rank Change
▼9
was #631

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

54.1 / 100 · 67.0% confidence

iOS Simulator MCP MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
18.9 / 25
9.4 above avg 9.5
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.6 above avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.1 / 17
1.3 above avg 11.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
14.1 / 20
1.9 above avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
8.0 / 20
1.8 above avg 6.2

Activity Inputs

62.7 / 100
StarsRepository reach
20.0 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
21.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
11.3 / 25
CommunityFork signal
9.3 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
npm attestation
OSSF Scorecard
5.4 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 1, 2026
Signed Commits
92%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests 2
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 3
Contributors 3
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 9
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 3
SAST 0
Security-Policy 4
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 9
Vulnerabilities 10

Is iOS Simulator MCP safe?

Public trust evidence for iOS Simulator MCP is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does iOS Simulator MCP publish package provenance?
Yes. iOS Simulator MCP's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does iOS Simulator MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
iOS Simulator MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.4/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is iOS Simulator MCP actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 22 days ago.
What license does iOS Simulator MCP use?
iOS Simulator MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are iOS Simulator MCP's commits signed?
92% of the last 100 commits to iOS Simulator MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
iOS Simulator MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain iOS Simulator MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores iOS Simulator MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 5HVTrust 2Grade 2Listed 1Scorecard 1
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 39 spots (#592 → #631)
2026-09-02
Grade Changed
Trust grade A → C
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 502 spots (#90 → #592)
2026-09-02
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 27.2pts (81.4 → 54.2)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#76 → #88)
2026-08-26
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 5.4/10
2026-08-26
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → A
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 69 spots (#140 → #71)
2026-08-26
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 11.3pts (70.5 → 81.8)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#126 → #136)
2026-08-10
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #134
GitHub → npm: ios-simulator-mcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 54.1 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/ios-simulator-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/ios-simulator-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/ios-simulator-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/ios-simulator-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON