InternAgent

InternAgent-1.5: A Unified Agentic Framework for Long-Horizon Autonomous Scientific Discovery

Research & Data Python Grade D Listed NOASSERTION
15.0/100
Rank #1328 of 1328
Compare InternAgent

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade D · 1/5 signals
Last push
2026-07-29 · 45d ago
Recent change
No recent signal change

Is InternAgent safe? InternAgent scores 15.0/100 (Grade D), ranked #1328 of 1328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage D (1 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 10% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-07-29. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Research & Data

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.
Recent Changes
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 28 spots (#1257 → #1285)
2026-08-28
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 6pts (56 → 50)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#1219 → #1249)
Maintainer Checklist
Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 45 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
47.6
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#33

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage D is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (1 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-12 03:32 UTC · Repo last pushed 45 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-12

Activity & Reach

Stars
1.4k
Forks
129
Last Push
2026-07-29
45 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
3
Rank Change
=
was #1328

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Research & Data

15.0 / 100 · 50.0% confidence

InternAgent Research & Data average (33 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
0.5 / 25
7.7 below avg 8.2
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
1.1 below avg 11.9
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
8.5 / 17
3.3 below avg 11.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
9.0 / 20
3.9 below avg 12.9
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
7.6 / 20
3.3 below avg 10.9

Activity Inputs

47.6 / 100
StarsRepository reach
18.9 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
18.8 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
9.8 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
Not available
Signed Commits
10%
of last 100 commits verified

Is InternAgent safe?

Public trust evidence for InternAgent is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does InternAgent publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for InternAgent. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does InternAgent have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for InternAgent. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is InternAgent actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 45 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does InternAgent use?
InternAgent ships under NOASSERTION. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are InternAgent's commits signed?
10% of the last 100 commits to InternAgent are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
InternAgent appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
8 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
4 tags
Broad capability areas detected.
  • browser
  • code
  • database
  • shell
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain InternAgent?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores InternAgent from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 7Score 2Listed 1
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 28 spots (#1257 → #1285)
2026-08-28
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 6pts (56 → 50)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#1219 → #1249)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#1187 → #1213)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 72 spots (#1113 → #1185)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 605 spots (#506 → #1111)
2026-08-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#460 → #495)
2026-08-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#441 → #461)
2026-07-29
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 13pts (47 → 60)
2026-07-28
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #440

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 15.0 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/internagent.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/internagent)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/internagent"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/internagent.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Research & Data

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON