updated 2026-08-23 22:02 UTC

Integuru

Integuru-AI/Integuru

The first AI agent that builds permissionless integrations through reverse engineering platforms' internal APIs.

Coding Agents Python Grade D Listed AGPL-3.0
44.2/100
Rank #539 of 1308
Compare Integuru

How does it stack up against its Coding Agents neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-06-24 · 60d ago
Recent change
Rank

Is Integuru safe? Integuru scores 44.2/100 (Grade D), ranked #539 of 1308 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.1/10; 58% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-06-24. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Coding Agents

#43 Stakpak Agent — 45.0 (D) → #44 Vibe Kanban — 44.7 (D) → #46 DeepSeek Harness — 43.0 (D) → #47 GPT Pilot — 42.7 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#549 → #537)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#519 → #531)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#510 → #528)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.1/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 60 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Integuru View Coding Agents Report missing data
50.8
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#45
In Coding Agents

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-23 22:02 UTC · Repo last pushed 60 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-23

Activity & Reach

Stars
4.8k
Forks
382
Last Push
2026-06-24
60 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
10
Rank Change
▼2
was #537

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Coding Agents

44.2 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Integuru Coding Agents average (70 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
6.8 / 25
0.8 below avg 7.6
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.8 below avg 11.6
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.1 / 17
in line with avg 11.1
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
8.0 / 20
6.9 below avg 14.9
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
8.8 / 20
3.4 below avg 12.2

Activity Inputs

50.8 / 100
StarsRepository reach
22.1 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
16.7 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
12.0 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
3.1 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 22, 2026
Signed Commits
58%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests 0
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 2
Contributors 0
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 0
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is Integuru safe?

Public trust evidence for Integuru is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Integuru publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Integuru. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Integuru have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Integuru has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.1/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Integuru actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 60 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does Integuru use?
Integuru ships under AGPL-3.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Integuru's commits signed?
57% of the last 100 commits to Integuru are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
medium confidence
1 tags
Broad capability areas detected.
  • browser
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Integuru?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Integuru from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 9Listed 1HVTrust 1Scorecard 1
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#549 → #537)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#519 → #531)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#510 → #528)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 140 spots (#366 → #506)
2026-07-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#339 → #349)
2026-07-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#300 → #323)
2026-07-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#280 → #300)
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 34 spots (#246 → #280)
2026-07-10
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.9/10
2026-07-10
Rank Moved
Rank rose 79 spots (#325 → #246)
2026-07-10
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 29.1pts (19.4 → 48.5)
2026-07-09
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #325
GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 44.2 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/integuru.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/integuru)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/integuru"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/integuru.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Coding Agents

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON