Is GPT Pilot safe to use?

GPT Pilot has an HVTrust score of 42.6/100 (Grade D), ranked #582 of 1308 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for GPT Pilot?

GPT Pilot scores 42.6/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 33.7k GitHub stars and is categorized under Coding Agents.

GPT Pilot

Pythagora-io/gpt-pilot

The first real AI developer

Coding Agents Python Grade D Listed NOASSERTION Source-available

42.6/100

Rank #582 of 1308

Compare GPT Pilot

How does it stack up against its Coding Agents neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade A · 4/5 signals

Last push

2026-06-18 · 68d ago

Recent change

No recent signal change

Is GPT Pilot safe? GPT Pilot scores 42.6/100 (Grade D), ranked #582 of 1308 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage A (4 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 2.5/10; recent commits are unsigned; last pushed 2026-06-18. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Coding Agents

#46 DeepSeek Harness — 42.8 (D) → #47 Ouroboros (Agent OS) — 42.7 (D) → #49 Sweep — 41.6 (D) → #50 Antigravity CLI — 41.2 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-08-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#552 → #564)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#535 → #553)

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 161 spots (#374 → #535)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 2.5/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 68 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for GPT Pilot View Coding Agents Report missing data

59.4

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#48

In Coding Agents

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage A is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (4 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-25

Activity & Reach

Stars

33.7k

Forks

3.5k

Last Push

2026-06-18

68 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

pypi

HN mentions (30d)

Open Issues

242

Rank Change

▲7

was #589

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Coding Agents

42.6 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

GPT Pilot Coding Agents average (70 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

3.1 / 25

4.5 below avg 7.6

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.8 below avg 11.6

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

10.6 / 17

in line with avg 11.1

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

7.5 / 20

7.4 below avg 14.9

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

12.4 / 20

in line with avg 12.2

Activity Inputs

59.4 / 100

StarsRepository reach

27.2 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

15.6 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

0.0 / 25

CommunityFork signal

16.5 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

2.5 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 24, 2026

Signed Commits

—

Unable to query

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests 0

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 9

Maintained 1

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Is GPT Pilot safe?

Source-available software. A lower HVTrust score reflects fewer public supply-chain artifacts (open license, build provenance, signed commits) — not a security finding. GPT Pilot may have internal security practices not visible through public signals.

Public trust evidence for GPT Pilot is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does GPT Pilot publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for GPT Pilot. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does GPT Pilot have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

GPT Pilot has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 2.5/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is GPT Pilot actively maintained?

Slowing down. Last push was 68 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.

What license does GPT Pilot use?

GPT Pilot ships under NOASSERTION. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

None detected

No MCP server signal detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

4 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

medium confidence

1 tags

Broad capability areas detected.

database

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

low confidence

Unknown

Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

Maintain GPT Pilot?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores GPT Pilot from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-08-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#552 → #564)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#535 → #553)

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 161 spots (#374 → #535)

2026-07-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#348 → #359)

2026-07-15

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 25 spots (#311 → #336)

2026-07-14

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 21 spots (#290 → #311)

2026-07-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 31 spots (#259 → #290)

2026-06-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 29 spots (#202 → #231)

2026-06-23

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#189 → #202)

2026-06-21

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#170 → #180)

2026-06-19

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → D

2026-06-18

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-06-16

Rank Moved

Rank rose 20 spots (#176 → #156)

2026-06-16

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 4.8pts (44.8 → 49.6)

2026-06-16

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 10pts (62 → 72)

2026-06-15

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 20 spots (#156 → #176)

2026-06-15

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust down 4.7pts (49.5 → 44.8)

2026-06-15

Activity Score Changed

Activity score down 10pts (72 → 62)

2026-06-14

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → D

2026-06-13

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-06-13

Rank Moved

Rank rose 22 spots (#176 → #154)

2026-06-13

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 5.0pts (45.0 → 50.0)

2026-06-13

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 11pts (62 → 72)

2026-06-11

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 20 spots (#156 → #176)

2026-06-11

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust down 4.7pts (49.7 → 45.0)

2026-06-11

Activity Score Changed

Activity score down 7pts (68 → 62)

2026-06-10

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 4.5pts (45.2 → 49.7)

2026-06-10

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 7pts (62 → 68)

2026-06-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#138 → #150)

2026-06-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 17 spots (#121 → #138)

2026-05-29

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 9.9pts (34.1 → 44.0)

GitHub → PyPI: gpt-pilot

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/gpt-pilot.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/gpt-pilot)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/gpt-pilot"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/gpt-pilot.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Coding Agents

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI · Algolia HN Search API
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON