Is Infobip MCP safe to use?

Infobip MCP has an HVTrust score of 47.9/100 (Grade D), ranked #999 of 1325 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Infobip MCP?

Infobip MCP scores 47.9/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 35 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

Infobip MCP

infobip/mcp

Infobip Remote MCP Servers Documentation

MCP Servers Listed MIT

Is Infobip MCP safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 3.0 / 10

Provenance None

Signed commits 63%

Last push 10d ago

Compare Infobip MCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: Infobip MCP scores 47.9/100 (Grade D), ranked #999 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.0/10; 63% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-17. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Infobip MCP compares in MCP Servers

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Infobip MCP’s 47.9.

Where the 47.9 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

47.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Infobip MCP MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

6.9 / 25

3.4 below avg 10.3

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

2.6 below avg 13.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

11.1 / 17

1.1 below avg 12.2

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

14.4 / 20

2.4 above avg 12.0

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

3.7 / 20

3.6 below avg 7.3

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank rose 28 spots (#1020 → #992)

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: OpenAI

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.0/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Infobip MCP View MCP Servers Report missing data

47.0

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#586

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-27

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-09-17

10 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

was #999

Analysis

Activity Inputs

47.0 / 100

StarsRepository reach

9.3 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

23.6 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

9.7 / 25

CommunityFork signal

4.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

3.0 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 26, 2026

Signed Commits

63%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests 0

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 6

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow -1

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 5

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies -1

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions -1

Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about Infobip MCP

Public trust evidence for Infobip MCP is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does Infobip MCP publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Infobip MCP. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Infobip MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Infobip MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.0/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Infobip MCP actively maintained?

Maintained. Last push was 10 days ago.

What license does Infobip MCP use?

Infobip MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Infobip MCP's commits signed?

62% of the last 100 commits to Infobip MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

medium confidence

Implemented

Infobip MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

1 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

OpenAI

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Infobip MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: OpenAI

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain Infobip MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Infobip MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank rose 28 spots (#1020 → #992)

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: OpenAI

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 446 spots (#570 → #1016)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 11.1pts (35.6 → 46.7)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #570

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-12

Rank Moved

Rank rose 101 spots (#1113 → #1012)

2026-09-12

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 4.7pts (41.9 → 46.6)

2026-09-12

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 14pts (31 → 44)

2026-09-09

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#1093 → #1107)

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 27 spots (#1058 → #1085)

2026-09-06

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 17 spots (#1041 → #1058)

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 38 spots (#1003 → #1041)

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 26 spots (#977 → #1003)

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 61 spots (#916 → #977)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 50 spots (#866 → #916)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 31 spots (#835 → #866)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 32 spots (#803 → #835)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 28 spots (#775 → #803)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 47 spots (#728 → #775)

2026-08-28

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 3.1/10

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank rose 471 spots (#1199 → #728)

2026-08-28

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 24.1pts (18.7 → 42.8)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#1186 → #1199)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 47 spots (#1139 → #1186)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 55 spots (#1077 → #1132)

2026-08-15

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 17 spots (#1060 → #1077)

2026-08-12

Rank Moved

Rank rose 14 spots (#1064 → #1050)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 58 spots (#998 → #1056)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #992

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/infobip-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/infobip-mcp)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/infobip-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/infobip-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON