Is Glidermcp Com safe to use?

Glidermcp Com has an HVTrust score of 45.2/100 (Grade D), ranked #1061 of 1325 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Glidermcp Com?

Glidermcp Com scores 45.2/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 16 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

Glidermcp Com

glidermcp/glidermcp.com

Glider MCP - code analysis for AI assistants

MCP Servers Listed MIT

Is Glidermcp Com safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10

Provenance None

Signed commits 36%

Last push 14d ago

Compare Glidermcp Com

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: Glidermcp Com scores 45.2/100 (Grade D), ranked #1061 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.0/10; 36% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-12. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Glidermcp Com compares in MCP Servers

#621 Google Knowledge Graph MCP 45.3 +0.1
#622 Storeshots MCP 45.3 +0.1
#623 Glidermcp Com 45.2 this agent
#624 Pty MCP 45.1 −0.1
#625 CodeWiki MCP — AI-generated docs for GitHub repos 45.1 −0.1

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Glidermcp Com’s 45.2.

Where the 45.2 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

45.2 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Glidermcp Com MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

6.8 / 25

3.5 below avg 10.3

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

2.6 below avg 13.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

11.9 / 17

in line with avg 12.2

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

13.0 / 20

0.9 above avg 12.1

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

3.0 / 20

4.2 below avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#1051 → #1061)

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.0/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Glidermcp Com View MCP Servers Report missing data

38.0

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#623

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-09-12

14 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

was #1061

Analysis

Activity Inputs

38.0 / 100

StarsRepository reach

7.4 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

23.1 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

6.0 / 25

CommunityFork signal

1.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

4.0 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 19, 2026

Signed Commits

36%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests 3

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 3

Dangerous-Workflow -1

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies -1

SAST 0

Security-Policy 3

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions -1

Vulnerabilities 10

Common questions about Glidermcp Com

Public trust evidence for Glidermcp Com is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does Glidermcp Com publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Glidermcp Com. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Glidermcp Com have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Glidermcp Com has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.0/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Glidermcp Com actively maintained?

Maintained. Last push was 14 days ago.

What license does Glidermcp Com use?

Glidermcp Com ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Glidermcp Com's commits signed?

36% of the last 100 commits to Glidermcp Com are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

None detected

No MCP server signal detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

medium confidence

1 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Anthropic

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Glidermcp Com's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

2026-09-13

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: implemented → none

Maintain Glidermcp Com?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Glidermcp Com from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#1051 → #1061)

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 471 spots (#575 → #1046)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 10.0pts (35.4 → 45.4)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #575

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-20

Rank Moved

Rank rose 18 spots (#1060 → #1042)

2026-09-13

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: implemented → none

2026-09-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 50 spots (#1000 → #1050)

2026-09-12

Rank Moved

Rank rose 17 spots (#1017 → #1000)

2026-09-12

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 6pts (34 → 40)

2026-09-11

Rank Moved

Rank rose 69 spots (#1086 → #1017)

2026-09-11

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 3.0pts (43.2 → 46.2)

2026-09-11

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 6pts (28 → 34)

2026-09-09

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#1072 → #1084)

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 37 spots (#1026 → #1063)

2026-09-06

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#1015 → #1026)

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 46 spots (#969 → #1015)

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 31 spots (#938 → #969)

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 54 spots (#884 → #938)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 47 spots (#837 → #884)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 34 spots (#803 → #837)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 33 spots (#770 → #803)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 28 spots (#742 → #770)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 47 spots (#695 → #742)

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 24 spots (#671 → #695)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 19 spots (#652 → #671)

2026-08-26

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 4.0/10

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank rose 408 spots (#1060 → #652)

2026-08-26

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 23.9pts (20.3 → 44.2)

2026-08-26

Activity Score Changed

Activity score down 10pts (40 → 30)

2026-08-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 28 spots (#1032 → #1060)

2026-08-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 13 spots (#1033 → #1020)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 30 spots (#1003 → #1033)

2026-08-12

Rank Moved

Rank rose 13 spots (#1003 → #990)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 57 spots (#944 → #1001)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #932

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/glidermcp-com.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/glidermcp-com)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/glidermcp-com"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/glidermcp-com.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON