Generative Media Skills

Open-source, self-hosted AI agent workspace and alternative to OpenAI Dots, Meta Muse, Grok Bot, Instinct, Manus Cue, Claude Cowork, and ChatGPT agent. MIT-licensed; includes chat, connectors, approvals, and optional computer use. Early prototype.

Agent Skills Python Needs review Unlicensed

Is Generative Media Skills safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 2.5 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 64%
Last push today
Compare Generative Media Skills
Suggest a correction

In detail: Generative Media Skills scores 45.6/100 (Grade D), ranked #294 of 371 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 2.5/10; 64% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-10-11. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Generative Media Skills could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Active listing, but review is needed
  • [4.1.1] no declared license (GitHub license field is null)

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Generative Media Skills and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities and, for skills, AST02 Supply Chain Compromise.

  1. Source Partly signed

    github.com/Anil-matcha/open-dots, last pushed 2026-10-11. 64% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Weak

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 2.5/10 (scanned Oct 9, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review4
    • Branch Protection0
    • Signed Releasesn/a
    • Dangerous Workflown/a
    • Token Permissionsn/a
    • Pinned Dependencies0
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 0
    CI-Tests 0
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 4
    Contributors 3
    Dangerous-Workflow -1
    Dependency-Update-Tool 0
    Fuzzing 0
    License 0
    Maintained 10
    Packaging -1
    Pinned-Dependencies 0
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 0
    Signed-Releases -1
    Token-Permissions -1
    Vulnerabilities 0
  3. Published packages None

    No registry package. Generative Media Skills is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-10-07 License classification changed from open to unlicensed
  • 2026-09-04 OSSF Scorecard: 6.1/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads (missing)
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Generative Media Skills’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read the skill’s instructions for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you install it, such as Cisco Skill Scanner.

How Generative Media Skills compares in Agent Skills

  1. #292 Wondelai Skills 45.8 +0.2
  2. #293 J-Space Cognition Suite 45.8 +0.2
  3. #294 Generative Media Skills 45.6 this agent
  4. #295 Heygen Com Skills 45.5 −0.1
  5. #296 Oh Dsh 45.4 −0.2

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Generative Media Skills’s 45.6.

Where the 45.6 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

45.6 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Generative Media Skills Agent Skills average (371 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
6.3 / 25
1.5 below avg 7.8
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.6 below avg 11.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
2.1 / 17
10.0 below avg 12.1
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
18.4 / 20
4.3 above avg 14.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
9.0 / 20
in line with avg 9.0

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-10-09
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → D
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 84 spots (#207 → #291)
2026-10-09
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 7.7pts (52.6 → 44.9)
Maintainer Checklist
Declare an open license Publish a clear OSI-approved license so usage and maintenance terms are independently verifiable.
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 2.5/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Review Flags
[4.1.1] no declared license (GitHub license field is null)
80.5
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#294

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-10-11 12:08 UTC · Repo last pushed today

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-11

Activity & Reach

Stars
5.7k
Forks
686
Last Push
2026-10-11
today
Commits (4 wk)
38
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
=
was #294

Analysis

Activity Inputs

80.5 / 100
StarsRepository reach
22.5 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
19.8 / 25
CommunityFork signal
13.2 / 20

Common questions about Generative Media Skills

Public trust evidence for Generative Media Skills is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Generative Media Skills publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Generative Media Skills. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Generative Media Skills have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Generative Media Skills has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 2.5/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Generative Media Skills actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Generative Media Skills use?
Generative Media Skills ships under no SPDX license detected. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Generative Media Skills's commits signed?
64% of the last 100 commits to Generative Media Skills are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Generative Media Skills's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-10-07
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Postgres
2026-10-07
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: implemented → none
2026-10-02
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-30
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none
2026-09-30
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: implemented → none
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain Generative Media Skills?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Generative Media Skills from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 20HVTrust 4MCP 4Grade 3Listed 2Surface 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1Score 1Warning Issued 1Surface 1License 1
2026-10-09
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → D
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 84 spots (#207 → #291)
2026-10-09
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 7.7pts (52.6 → 44.9)
2026-10-07
License Changed
License classification changed from open to unlicensed
2026-10-07
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Postgres
2026-10-07
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: implemented → none
2026-10-07
Warning Issued
Warning: eligibility issues detected
2026-10-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 101 spots (#105 → #206)
2026-10-07
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 7.3pts (59.9 → 52.6)
2026-10-02
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-10-02
Rank Moved
Rank rose 22 spots (#134 → #112)
2026-10-01
Rank Moved
Rank rose 30 spots (#164 → #134)
2026-09-30
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none
2026-09-30
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: implemented → none
2026-09-30
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 8pts (68 → 76)
2026-09-28
Rank Moved
Rank rose 32 spots (#186 → #154)
2026-09-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#172 → #182)
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#155 → #172)
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 74 spots (#74 → #148)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 8.8pts (46.2 → 55.0)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #74
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 24 spots (#155 → #131)
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#110 → #133)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#106 → #118)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#114 → #102)
2026-09-04
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 6.1/10
2026-09-04
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank rose 191 spots (#305 → #114)
2026-09-04
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 33.5pts (21.4 → 54.9)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#294 → #305)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#278 → #288)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#250 → #272)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#227 → #250)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#213 → #227)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#203 → #213)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 95 spots (#108 → #203)
2026-08-11
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #100

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 45.6 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/generative-media-skills.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/generative-media-skills)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/generative-media-skills"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/generative-media-skills.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON