Generative Media Skills

Open-source, self-hosted alternative to Grok Bot, Claude Duet, OpenAI Dots, Meta Muse, Instinct, Manus Cue: AI coworkers (named agents) with instructions, memory, routines, their own isolated computer, and your approval before they act.

Agent Skills Python Listed Apache-2.0

Is Generative Media Skills safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 3.4 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 15%
Last push yesterday
Compare Generative Media Skills
Suggest a correction

In detail: Generative Media Skills scores 55.3/100 (Grade C), ranked #176 of 384 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.4/10; 15% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-11-09. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Generative Media Skills could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Generative Media Skills and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities and, for skills, AST02 Supply Chain Compromise.

  1. Source Partly signed

    github.com/Anil-matcha/open-dots, Apache-2.0, last pushed 2026-11-09. 15% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Weak

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 3.4/10 (scanned Nov 1, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review0
    • Branch Protection0
    • Signed Releases0
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions0
    • Pinned Dependencies1
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 0
    CI-Tests 3
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 0
    Contributors 6
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 0
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 10
    Packaging 10
    Pinned-Dependencies 1
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 0
    Signed-Releases 0
    Token-Permissions 0
    Vulnerabilities 0
  3. Published packages None

    No registry package. Generative Media Skills is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-10-23 License classification changed from unlicensed to open
  • 2026-10-07 License classification changed from open to unlicensed
  • 2026-09-04 OSSF Scorecard: 6.1/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads (missing)
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Generative Media Skills’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read the skill’s instructions for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you install it, such as Cisco Skill Scanner.

How Generative Media Skills compares in Agent Skills

  1. #174 Wesight 55.4 +0.1
  2. #175 Ios Simulator Skill 55.3 ±0
  3. #176 Generative Media Skills 55.3 this agent
  4. #177 geo-sleuth 55.3 ±0
  5. #178 Html Anything 55.2 −0.1

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Generative Media Skills’s 55.3.

Where the 55.3 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

55.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Generative Media Skills Agent Skills average (384 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
5.0 / 25
3.2 below avg 8.2
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.6 below avg 11.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.4 / 17
0.8 below avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
19.9 / 20
5.9 above avg 14.0
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
9.2 / 20
in line with avg 9.1

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-11-05
Rank Moved
Rank rose 16 spots (#188 → #172)
2026-11-01
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → marketplace
2026-11-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#170 → #186)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.4/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Compare with another agent
View Agent Skills Report missing data
86.8
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#176

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-11-10 04:07 UTC · Repo last pushed yesterday

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-11-10

Activity & Reach

Stars
6.9k
Forks
899
Last Push
2026-11-09
yesterday
Commits (4 wk)
611
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
2
Rank Change
▼1
was #175

Analysis

Activity Inputs

86.8 / 100
StarsRepository reach
23.1 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
13.7 / 20

Common questions about Generative Media Skills

Generative Media Skills has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Generative Media Skills publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Generative Media Skills. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Generative Media Skills have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Generative Media Skills has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.4/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Generative Media Skills actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Generative Media Skills use?
Generative Media Skills ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Generative Media Skills's commits signed?
15% of the last 100 commits to Generative Media Skills are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Declared
MCP support appears present, but direct server implementation is less certain.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Marketplace
Marketplace plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Generative Media Skills's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-11-01
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → marketplace
2026-10-18
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → declared
2026-10-07
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Postgres
2026-10-07
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: implemented → none
2026-10-02
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-30
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none
2026-09-30
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: implemented → none
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain Generative Media Skills?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Generative Media Skills from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 30HVTrust 5MCP 5Grade 4Surface 3License 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1Listed 1Score 1Warning Issued 1Surface 1Warning Cleared 1
2026-11-05
Rank Moved
Rank rose 16 spots (#188 → #172)
2026-11-01
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → marketplace
2026-11-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#170 → #186)
2026-10-31
Rank Moved
Rank rose 16 spots (#186 → #170)
2026-10-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#177 → #191)
2026-10-25
Rank Moved
Rank rose 14 spots (#191 → #177)
2026-10-23
License Changed
License classification changed from unlicensed to open
2026-10-23
Warning Cleared
Warning cleared: eligibility issues resolved
2026-10-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-10-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 125 spots (#316 → #191)
2026-10-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 9.4pts (45.3 → 54.7)
2026-10-18
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → declared
2026-10-18
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#295 → #313)
2026-10-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#306 → #295)
2026-10-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#287 → #306)
2026-10-11
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#294 → #283)
2026-10-09
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → D
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 84 spots (#207 → #291)
2026-10-09
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 7.7pts (52.6 → 44.9)
2026-10-07
License Changed
License classification changed from open to unlicensed
2026-10-07
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Postgres
2026-10-07
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: implemented → none
2026-10-07
Warning Issued
Warning: eligibility issues detected
2026-10-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 101 spots (#105 → #206)
2026-10-07
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 7.3pts (59.9 → 52.6)
2026-10-02
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-10-02
Rank Moved
Rank rose 22 spots (#134 → #112)
2026-10-01
Rank Moved
Rank rose 30 spots (#164 → #134)
2026-09-30
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none
2026-09-30
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: implemented → none
2026-09-30
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 8pts (68 → 76)
2026-09-28
Rank Moved
Rank rose 32 spots (#186 → #154)
2026-09-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#172 → #182)
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#155 → #172)
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 74 spots (#74 → #148)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 8.8pts (46.2 → 55.0)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #74
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 24 spots (#155 → #131)
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#110 → #133)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#106 → #118)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#114 → #102)
2026-09-04
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 6.1/10
2026-09-04
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank rose 191 spots (#305 → #114)
2026-09-04
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 33.5pts (21.4 → 54.9)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#294 → #305)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#278 → #288)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#250 → #272)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#227 → #250)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#213 → #227)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#203 → #213)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 95 spots (#108 → #203)

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 55.3 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/generative-media-skills.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/generative-media-skills)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/generative-media-skills"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/generative-media-skills.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON