Galaxy MCP
Is Galaxy MCP safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
Compare Galaxy MCP
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: Galaxy MCP scores 62.2/100 (Grade C), ranked #564 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.9/10; 26% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-26. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How Galaxy MCP compares in MCP Servers
- #317 Companies House MCP 62.3 +0.1
- #318 CN Scraper MCP 62.3 +0.1
- #319 Galaxy MCP 62.2 this agent
- #320 Wet MCP 62.1 −0.1
- #321 Outlook MCP 62.1 −0.1
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Galaxy MCP’s 62.2.
Where the 62.2 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
62.2 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceGalaxy MCP MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
64.7 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about Galaxy MCP
Does Galaxy MCP publish package provenance?
Does Galaxy MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Galaxy MCP actively maintained?
What license does Galaxy MCP use?
Are Galaxy MCP's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to Galaxy MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain Galaxy MCP?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Galaxy MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/galaxy-mcp)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/galaxy-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/galaxy-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON