Endnote MCP

Connect your EndNote reference library to Claude AI — search, cite, and read PDFs directly in conversations

MCP Servers Python Listed AGPL-3.0

Is Endnote MCP safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 4.1 / 10
Provenance Attested
Signed commits 4%
Last push 4d ago
Compare Endnote MCP
Suggest a correction

In detail: Endnote MCP scores 72.4/100 (Grade B), ranked #279 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.1/10; 4% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-22. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Endnote MCP compares in MCP Servers

  1. #164 Upstash MCP Server 72.5 +0.1
  2. #165 MCP Zuul 72.4 ±0
  3. #166 Endnote MCP 72.4 this agent
  4. #167 Ros MCP Server 72.3 −0.1
  5. #168 Reddit MCP Buddy 72.2 −0.2

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Endnote MCP’s 72.4.

Where the 72.4 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

72.4 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Endnote MCP MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
12.8 / 25
2.5 above avg 10.3
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.6 above avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.0 / 17
in line with avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
16.0 / 20
3.9 above avg 12.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
7.6 / 20
in line with avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Increase the share of verified signed commits for clearer maintainer identity.
Recent Changes
2026-09-24
Rank Moved
Rank rose 40 spots (#320 → #280)
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.1/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
52.2
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#166

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-26 06:32 UTC · Repo last pushed 4 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
49
Forks
6
Last Push
2026-09-22
4 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
11
Downloads (7d)
430
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
▲4
was #283

Analysis

Activity Inputs

52.2 / 100
StarsRepository reach
10.2 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.4 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
13.5 / 25
CommunityFork signal
3.9 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
pypi attestation
OSSF Scorecard
4.1 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 24, 2026
Signed Commits
4%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 3
CI-Tests 5
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 0
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases 0
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 10

Common questions about Endnote MCP

Endnote MCP has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Endnote MCP publish package provenance?
Yes. Endnote MCP's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does Endnote MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Endnote MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.1/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Endnote MCP actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 4 day(s).
What license does Endnote MCP use?
Endnote MCP ships under AGPL-3.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Endnote MCP's commits signed?
3% of the last 100 commits to Endnote MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Endnote MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Endnote MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected

Maintain Endnote MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Endnote MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 24HVTrust 3Listed 2Grade 2Scorecard 1Score 1Delisted 1Provenance 1MCP 1
2026-09-24
Rank Moved
Rank rose 40 spots (#320 → #280)
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → B
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 674 spots (#994 → #320)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 45.3pts (25.1 → 70.4)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #994
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-17
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#862 → #874)
2026-09-13
Rank Moved
Rank rose 15 spots (#881 → #866)
2026-09-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#871 → #881)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#853 → #871)
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank rose 10 spots (#867 → #857)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#856 → #867)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 38 spots (#818 → #856)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#805 → #818)
2026-09-05
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank rose 142 spots (#947 → #805)
2026-09-05
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 7.1pts (44.1 → 51.2)
2026-09-05
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 20pts (26 → 46)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#923 → #947)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 54 spots (#869 → #923)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 55 spots (#814 → #869)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 29 spots (#785 → #814)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 38 spots (#747 → #785)
2026-08-30
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.0/10
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank rose 281 spots (#1028 → #747)
2026-08-30
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 17.1pts (27.6 → 44.7)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 51 spots (#977 → #1028)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 36 spots (#941 → #977)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#915 → #941)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 111 spots (#804 → #915)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#788 → #803)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#776 → #786)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 41 spots (#743 → #784)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #739

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 72.4 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/endnote-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/endnote-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/endnote-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/endnote-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON