Is Dynatrace Managed MCP safe to use?

Dynatrace Managed MCP has an HVTrust score of 83.9/100 (Grade A), ranked #97 of 1325 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Dynatrace Managed MCP?

Dynatrace Managed MCP scores 83.9/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 31 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

Dynatrace Managed MCP

dynatrace-oss/dynatrace-managed-mcp

An MCP server for self-hosted Dynatrace Managed platform

MCP Servers TypeScript Listed Apache-2.0

Is Dynatrace Managed MCP safe? Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.

OSSF Scorecard 7.8 / 10

Provenance Attested

Signed commits 38%

Last push 3d ago

Compare Dynatrace Managed MCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: Dynatrace Managed MCP scores 83.9/100 (Grade A), ranked #97 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 7.8/10; 38% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-23. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Dynatrace Managed MCP compares in MCP Servers

#35 ClickHouse 84.1 +0.2
#36 Better Godot MCP 84.0 +0.1
#37 Dynatrace Managed MCP 83.9 this agent
#38 Better Notion MCP 83.9 ±0
#39 iMessage MCP 83.7 −0.2

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Dynatrace Managed MCP’s 83.9.

Where the 83.9 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

83.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Dynatrace Managed MCP MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

19.1 / 25

8.8 above avg 10.3

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

18.0 / 18

4.6 above avg 13.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

15.1 / 17

2.9 above avg 12.2

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

19.7 / 20

7.6 above avg 12.1

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

7.3 / 20

in line with avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Increase the share of verified signed commits for clearer maintainer identity.

Recent Changes

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintainer Checklist

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Dynatrace Managed MCP View MCP Servers Report missing data

63.7

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#37

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade A reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-09-23

3 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

602

npm

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼1

was #96

Analysis

Activity Inputs

63.7 / 100

StarsRepository reach

9.0 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.6 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

24.8 / 25

CommunityFork signal

5.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

Verified

npm attestation

OSSF Scorecard

7.8 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 24, 2026

Signed Commits

38%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 8

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 10

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 10

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 8

SAST 10

Security-Policy 10

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 5

Common questions about Dynatrace Managed MCP

Public supply-chain signals for Dynatrace Managed MCP are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but Dynatrace Managed MCP carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.

Does Dynatrace Managed MCP publish package provenance?

Yes. Dynatrace Managed MCP's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.

Does Dynatrace Managed MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Dynatrace Managed MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 7.8/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Dynatrace Managed MCP actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 3 day(s).

What license does Dynatrace Managed MCP use?

Dynatrace Managed MCP ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Dynatrace Managed MCP's commits signed?

38% of the last 100 commits to Dynatrace Managed MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

Dynatrace Managed MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

1 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Anthropic

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Dynatrace Managed MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Provenance Added

Package provenance attestation detected

2026-09-09

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

2026-09-04

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

Maintain Dynatrace Managed MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Dynatrace Managed MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Provenance Added

Package provenance attestation detected

2026-09-23

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → A

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank rose 509 spots (#602 → #93)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 50.5pts (33.7 → 84.2)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #602

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-09

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

2026-09-05

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → A

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank rose 539 spots (#621 → #82)

2026-09-05

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 28.7pts (55.0 → 83.7)

2026-09-04

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-04

Grade Changed

Trust grade A → C

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 560 spots (#61 → #621)

2026-09-04

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust down 29.0pts (84.0 → 55.0)

2026-09-02

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → A

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank rose 443 spots (#501 → #58)

2026-09-02

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 28.1pts (56.5 → 84.6)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#476 → #492)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank rose 10 spots (#486 → #476)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 19 spots (#467 → #486)

2026-08-26

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 7.9/10

2026-08-26

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank rose 81 spots (#532 → #451)

2026-08-26

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 11.0pts (45.0 → 56.0)

2026-08-22

Rank Moved

Rank rose 10 spots (#550 → #540)

2026-08-19

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#532 → #544)

2026-08-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 15 spots (#553 → #538)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#535 → #553)

2026-08-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#521 → #533)

2026-08-12

Rank Moved

Rank rose 11 spots (#532 → #521)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 19 spots (#513 → #532)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #512

GitHub → npm: @dynatrace-oss/dynatrace-managed-mcp-server

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/dynatrace-managed-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/dynatrace-managed-mcp)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/dynatrace-managed-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/dynatrace-managed-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON