DawnAI

Ridiculous speed. Readable code.

Agent Frameworks TypeScript Listed MIT

Is DawnAI safe? Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.

OSSF Scorecard 7.1 / 10
Provenance Attested
Signed commits 100%
Last push 2d ago
Advisories None known
Compare DawnAI
Suggest a correction

In detail: DawnAI scores 81.2/100 (Grade A), ranked #165 of 1387 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 7.1/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; no published advisory affects its latest release (@dawn-ai/cli); last pushed 2026-11-13. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How DawnAI could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships DawnAI and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Signed

    github.com/cacheplane/b4run, MIT, last pushed 2026-11-13. 100% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature, so changes trace to a verified account.

  2. Review and release Strong

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 7.1/10 (scanned Nov 14, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review10
    • Branch Protection3
    • Signed Releases10
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions0
    • Pinned Dependencies8
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 3
    CI-Tests 10
    CII-Best-Practices 5
    Code-Review 10
    Contributors 6
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 10
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 10
    Packaging -1
    Pinned-Dependencies 8
    SAST 9
    Security-Policy 10
    Signed-Releases 10
    Token-Permissions 0
    Vulnerabilities 0
  3. Published packages Partly attested

    • npm @dawn-ai/cli Source link points to cacheplane/dawnai, same owner Build provenance attested
  4. What you install today No known advisories

    Latest release checked: @dawn-ai/cli 0.8.26. No published advisory affects it (OSV, checked 2026-11-14).

Changes to this chain

No change to package provenance, package source links, Scorecard coverage or license in HVTracker's daily snapshots of DawnAI.

Evidence behind this score

Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues DawnAI’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How DawnAI compares in Agent Frameworks

  1. #14 AutoGen 82.2 +1.0
  2. #15 Reef 81.7 +0.5
  3. #16 DawnAI 81.2 this agent
  4. #17 Google Genkit 77.8 −3.4
  5. #18 CrewAI 77.6 −3.6

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks DawnAI’s 81.2.

Where the 81.2 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Frameworks average

81.2 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

DawnAI Agent Frameworks average (134 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
21.4 / 25
11.4 above avg 10.0
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
6.3 above avg 11.7
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
14.5 / 17
2.1 above avg 12.4
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
19.9 / 20
4.9 above avg 15.0
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
9.5 / 20
1.7 below avg 11.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Improve adoption to lift the weakest part of the trust profile.
Recent Changes
2026-10-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#133 → #145)
2026-10-27
Rank Moved
Rank rose 33 spots (#164 → #131)
2026-10-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Postgres
Maintainer Checklist
Keep signals current Trust posture is already in a healthy range. The main job is to keep provenance, maintenance, and public evidence fresh.
69.3
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#16

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade A reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-11-15 04:07 UTC · Repo last pushed 2 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-11-15

Activity & Reach

Stars
266
Forks
10
Last Push
2026-11-13
2 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
131
Downloads (7d)
548
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
14
Rank Change
▼2
was #163

Analysis

Activity Inputs

69.3 / 100
StarsRepository reach
14.6 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.7 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
4.8 / 20

Common questions about DawnAI

Public supply-chain signals for DawnAI are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but DawnAI carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.
Does DawnAI publish package provenance?
Yes. DawnAI's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does DawnAI have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
DawnAI has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 7.1/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is DawnAI actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 2 day(s).
What license does DawnAI use?
DawnAI ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are DawnAI's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to DawnAI are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
2 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
  • database
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
low confidence
Unknown
Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to DawnAI's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-10-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Postgres

Maintain DawnAI?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores DawnAI from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 19HVTrust 8Grade 7Surface 1
2026-10-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#133 → #145)
2026-10-27
Rank Moved
Rank rose 33 spots (#164 → #131)
2026-10-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Postgres
2026-10-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#149 → #161)
2026-10-21
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#127 → #147)
2026-10-19
Rank Moved
Rank rose 17 spots (#142 → #125)
2026-10-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#126 → #136)
2026-10-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 36 spots (#87 → #123)
2026-10-03
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 3.2pts (84.9 → 81.7)
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#55 → #85)
2026-09-21
Rank Moved
Rank rose 28 spots (#83 → #55)
2026-09-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#69 → #82)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank rose 16 spots (#80 → #64)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#62 → #78)
2026-09-03
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → A
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank rose 483 spots (#543 → #60)
2026-09-03
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 28.3pts (55.8 → 84.1)
2026-09-02
Grade Changed
Trust grade A → C
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 475 spots (#68 → #543)
2026-09-02
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 28.3pts (84.1 → 55.8)
2026-08-31
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → A
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank rose 409 spots (#477 → #68)
2026-08-31
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 28.1pts (56.1 → 84.2)
2026-08-30
Grade Changed
Trust grade A → C
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 414 spots (#63 → #477)
2026-08-30
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 28.2pts (84.3 → 56.1)
2026-08-24
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → A
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank rose 334 spots (#386 → #52)
2026-08-24
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 28.7pts (56.1 → 84.8)
2026-08-22
Grade Changed
Trust grade A → C
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 334 spots (#52 → #386)
2026-08-22
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 28.7pts (84.9 → 56.2)
2026-08-19
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → A
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank rose 340 spots (#390 → #50)
2026-08-19
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 28.7pts (56.2 → 84.9)

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 81.2 Grade A
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/dawnai.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/dawnai)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/dawnai"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/dawnai.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Frameworks

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON