Continuous Claude v3

Context management for Claude Code. Hooks maintain state via ledgers and handoffs. MCP execution without context pollution. Agent orchestration with isolated context windows.

Agent Skills Python Listed MIT

Is Continuous Claude v3 safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 1.8 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 24%
Last push 257d ago
Compare Continuous Claude v3
Suggest a correction

In detail: Continuous Claude v3 scores 29.3/100 (Grade D), ranked #355 of 371 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 1.8/10; 24% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-01-26. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Continuous Claude v3 could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Continuous Claude v3 and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities and, for skills, AST02 Supply Chain Compromise.

  1. Source Partly signed

    github.com/parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3, MIT, last pushed 2026-01-26. 24% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Weak

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 1.8/10 (scanned Oct 6, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review3
    • Branch Protection0
    • Signed Releasesn/a
    • Dangerous Workflown/a
    • Token Permissionsn/a
    • Pinned Dependencies0
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 0
    CI-Tests 0
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 3
    Contributors 6
    Dangerous-Workflow -1
    Dependency-Update-Tool 0
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 0
    Packaging -1
    Pinned-Dependencies 0
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 0
    Signed-Releases -1
    Token-Permissions -1
    Vulnerabilities 0
  3. Published packages None

    No registry package. Continuous Claude v3 is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-09-06 OSSF Scorecard: 1.8/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads (missing)
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Continuous Claude v3’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read the skill’s instructions for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you install it, such as Cisco Skill Scanner.

How Continuous Claude v3 compares in Agent Skills

  1. #353 Subtask 32.3 +3.0
  2. #354 Claude to IM skill 31.9 +2.6
  3. #355 Continuous Claude v3 29.3 this agent
  4. #356 Universal Modder 27.9 −1.4
  5. #357 Adversarial Spec 27.8 −1.5

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Continuous Claude v3’s 29.3.

Where the 29.3 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

29.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Continuous Claude v3 Agent Skills average (371 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
3.5 / 25
4.3 below avg 7.8
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.6 below avg 11.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
10.0 / 17
2.0 below avg 12.0
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
0 / 20
14.1 below avg 14.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
8.6 / 20
in line with avg 9.0

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#333 → #345)
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, OpenAI, Perplexity, Postgres, Redis
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 1.8/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 257 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
33.1
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#355

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-10-10 20:07 UTC · Repo last pushed 257 days ago — may be stale

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-10

Activity & Reach

Stars
3.9k
Forks
303
Last Push
2026-01-26
257 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
32
Rank Change
▼3
was #352

Analysis

Activity Inputs

33.1 / 100
StarsRepository reach
21.6 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
0.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
11.5 / 20

Common questions about Continuous Claude v3

Public trust evidence for Continuous Claude v3 is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Continuous Claude v3 publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Continuous Claude v3. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Continuous Claude v3 have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Continuous Claude v3 has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 1.8/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Continuous Claude v3 actively maintained?
Stale. The repository has not been pushed to in 257 days. Consider whether the project is still being maintained.
What license does Continuous Claude v3 use?
Continuous Claude v3 ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Continuous Claude v3's commits signed?
24% of the last 100 commits to Continuous Claude v3 are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
5 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
  • database
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Continuous Claude v3's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, OpenAI, Perplexity, Postgres, Redis

Maintain Continuous Claude v3?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Continuous Claude v3 from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 3Listed 2HVTrust 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1Surface 1Surface 1
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#333 → #345)
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, OpenAI, Perplexity, Postgres, Redis
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#322 → #335)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 6.2pts (23.1 → 29.3)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #322
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-06
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 1.8/10
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank rose 34 spots (#330 → #296)
2026-09-06
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 18.3pts (11.0 → 29.3)
2026-08-26
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #326

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 29.3 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/continuous-claude-v3.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/continuous-claude-v3)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/continuous-claude-v3"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/continuous-claude-v3.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON