What is the trust score for CodeWiki MCP — AI-generated docs for GitHub repos?

CodeWiki MCP — AI-generated docs for GitHub repos scores 45.1/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 17 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

CodeWiki MCP — AI-generated docs for GitHub repos

izzzzzi/codewiki-mcp

MCP server for codewiki.google — search, fetch docs, and ask questions about any open-source repo

MCP Servers TypeScript Listed MIT

Is CodeWiki MCP — AI-generated docs for GitHub repos safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 3.8 / 10

Provenance None

Signed commits 22%

Last push 96d ago

Compare CodeWiki MCP — AI-generated docs for GitHub repos

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: CodeWiki MCP — AI-generated docs for GitHub repos scores 45.1/100 (Grade D), ranked #1064 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.8/10; 22% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-06-22. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How CodeWiki MCP — AI-generated docs for GitHub repos compares in MCP Servers

#623 Glidermcp Com 45.2 +0.1
#624 Pty MCP 45.1 ±0
#625 CodeWiki MCP — AI-generated docs for GitHub repos 45.1 this agent
#626 Strava MCP 45.1 ±0
#627 Multi-MCP 45.1 ±0

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks CodeWiki MCP — AI-generated docs for GitHub repos’s 45.1.

Where the 45.1 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

45.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

CodeWiki MCP — AI-generated docs for GitHub repos MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

5.8 / 25

4.5 below avg 10.3

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

2.6 below avg 13.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

11.7 / 17

0.5 below avg 12.2

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

5.6 / 20

6.5 below avg 12.1

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

5.2 / 20

2.0 below avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank rose 160 spots (#1207 → #1047)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 26.9pts (18.5 → 45.4)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.8/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 96 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for CodeWiki MCP — AI-generated docs for GitHub repos View MCP Servers Report missing data

20.7

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#625

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-06-22

96 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

npm

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼2

was #1062

Analysis

Activity Inputs

20.7 / 100

StarsRepository reach

7.5 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

11.7 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

0.0 / 25

CommunityFork signal

1.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

3.8 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 14, 2026

Signed Commits

22%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 3

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 10

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 0

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 3

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about CodeWiki MCP — AI-generated docs for GitHub repos

Public trust evidence for CodeWiki MCP — AI-generated docs for GitHub repos is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does CodeWiki MCP — AI-generated docs for GitHub repos publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for CodeWiki MCP — AI-generated docs for GitHub repos. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does CodeWiki MCP — AI-generated docs for GitHub repos have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

CodeWiki MCP — AI-generated docs for GitHub repos has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.8/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is CodeWiki MCP — AI-generated docs for GitHub repos actively maintained?

Slowing down. Last push was 96 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.

What license does CodeWiki MCP — AI-generated docs for GitHub repos use?

CodeWiki MCP — AI-generated docs for GitHub repos ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are CodeWiki MCP — AI-generated docs for GitHub repos's commits signed?

21% of the last 100 commits to CodeWiki MCP — AI-generated docs for GitHub repos are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

CodeWiki MCP — AI-generated docs for GitHub repos appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

None detected

No clear third-party provider dependency detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to CodeWiki MCP — AI-generated docs for GitHub repos's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-20

Activity Went Stale

No commits for 90 days

Maintain CodeWiki MCP — AI-generated docs for GitHub repos?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores CodeWiki MCP — AI-generated docs for GitHub repos from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank rose 160 spots (#1207 → #1047)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 26.9pts (18.5 → 45.4)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #1207

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-20

Activity Went Stale

No commits for 90 days

2026-09-20

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#1033 → #1043)

2026-09-12

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#1019 → #1032)

2026-09-11

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#1009 → #1019)

2026-09-09

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#997 → #1013)

2026-09-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#985 → #997)

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 42 spots (#943 → #985)

2026-09-06

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#927 → #943)

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 55 spots (#872 → #927)

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 30 spots (#842 → #872)

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 50 spots (#792 → #842)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank rose 309 spots (#1101 → #792)

2026-09-02

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 15.2pts (31.7 → 46.9)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 42 spots (#1059 → #1101)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 31 spots (#1028 → #1059)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 57 spots (#971 → #1028)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 47 spots (#924 → #971)

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 37 spots (#887 → #924)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 28 spots (#859 → #887)

2026-08-26

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 3.8/10

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank rose 305 spots (#1164 → #859)

2026-08-26

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 13.5pts (18.4 → 31.9)

2026-08-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#1150 → #1164)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 24 spots (#1134 → #1158)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 67 spots (#1062 → #1129)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #1061

GitHub → npm: codewiki-mcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/codewiki-mcp-ai-generated-docs-for-github-repos.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/codewiki-mcp-ai-generated-docs-for-github-repos)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/codewiki-mcp-ai-generated-docs-for-github-repos"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/codewiki-mcp-ai-generated-docs-for-github-repos.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON