Is CodeGraphContext safe to use?

CodeGraphContext has an HVTrust score of 71.0/100 (Grade B), ranked #208 of 1320 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for CodeGraphContext?

CodeGraphContext scores 71.0/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 4.2k GitHub stars and is categorized under Memory & Knowledge.

CodeGraphContext

CodeGraphContext/CodeGraphContext

An MCP server plus a CLI tool that indexes local code into a graph database to provide context to AI assistants.

Memory & Knowledge Python Grade B Listed MIT

71.0/100

Rank #208 of 1320

Compare CodeGraphContext

How does it stack up against its Memory & Knowledge neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade B · 3/5 signals

Last push

2026-09-02 · 2d ago

Recent change

Rank +8

Is CodeGraphContext safe? CodeGraphContext scores 71.0/100 (Grade B), ranked #208 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.3/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-02. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Memory & Knowledge

#17 RAGFlow — 72.0 (B) → #18 Tidb — 71.5 (B) → #20 txtai — 69.6 (B) → #21 Code-Graph-RAG — 68.3 (B) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#198 → #208)

2026-09-02

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → extension-based

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#185 → #195)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.3/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for CodeGraphContext View Memory & Knowledge Report missing data

84.3

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#19

In Memory & Knowledge

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-04

Activity & Reach

Stars

4.2k

Forks

825

Last Push

2026-09-02

2 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

3,591

pypi

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼10

was #198

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Memory & Knowledge

71.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

CodeGraphContext Memory & Knowledge average (44 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

10.4 / 25

1.0 below avg 11.4

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

1.6 below avg 12.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

12.2 / 17

0.7 below avg 12.9

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

19.6 / 20

2.0 above avg 17.6

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

13.4 / 20

in line with avg 13.3

Activity Inputs

84.3 / 100

StarsRepository reach

21.7 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.7 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

24.3 / 25

CommunityFork signal

13.6 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

4.3 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 1, 2026

Signed Commits

100%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 0

Branch-Protection 5

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 2

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 9

Security-Policy 10

Signed-Releases 0

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Is CodeGraphContext safe?

CodeGraphContext has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does CodeGraphContext publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for CodeGraphContext. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does CodeGraphContext have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

CodeGraphContext has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is CodeGraphContext actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 2 day(s).

What license does CodeGraphContext use?

CodeGraphContext ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are CodeGraphContext's commits signed?

100% of the last 100 commits to CodeGraphContext are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

CodeGraphContext appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

2 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Extensions

Extension based plugin/integration surface detected.

database

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to CodeGraphContext's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-02

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → extension-based

Maintain CodeGraphContext?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores CodeGraphContext from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#198 → #208)

2026-09-02

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → extension-based

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#185 → #195)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 26 spots (#159 → #185)

2026-08-29

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 4.3/10

2026-08-29

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → B

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank rose 548 spots (#711 → #163)

2026-08-29

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 28.1pts (43.3 → 71.4)

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 24 spots (#687 → #711)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 22 spots (#665 → #687)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 85 spots (#580 → #665)

2026-08-19

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#565 → #575)

2026-08-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 10 spots (#579 → #569)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#567 → #579)

2026-08-10

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #562

GitHub → PyPI: codegraphcontext

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/codegraphcontext.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/codegraphcontext)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/codegraphcontext"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/codegraphcontext.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Memory & Knowledge

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON