updated 2026-10-11 16:06 UTC

CodeGraph

Repository Website

Pre-indexed code knowledge graph, auto syncs on code changes, for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, OpenCode, AntiGravity, Kiro, CoPilot, and Hermes Agent — fewer tokens, fewer tool calls, 100% local

Protocols & Tool Integration C Listed MIT

Is CodeGraph safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 2.7 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 100%
Last push today
Compare CodeGraph

How does it stack up against its Protocols & Tool Integration neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: CodeGraph scores 63.7/100 (Grade C), ranked #545 of 1371 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 2.7/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-10-11. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How CodeGraph could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Already done? Suggest a correctionAdd the trust badge

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships CodeGraph and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Signed

    github.com/colbymchenry/codegraph, MIT, last pushed 2026-10-11. 100% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature, so changes trace to a verified account.

  2. Review and release Weak

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 2.7/10 (scanned Oct 4, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review0
    • Branch Protection5
    • Signed Releases0
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions0
    • Pinned Dependencies2
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 0
    Branch-Protection 5
    CI-Tests 0
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 0
    Contributors 10
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 0
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 10
    Packaging -1
    Pinned-Dependencies 2
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 0
    Signed-Releases 0
    Token-Permissions 0
    Vulnerabilities 0

  3. Published packages None

    No registry package. CodeGraph is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-08-29 OSSF Scorecard: 3.0/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads (missing)
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues CodeGraph’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

Signed credential (JSON) How to verify

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How CodeGraph compares in Protocols & Tool Integration

  1. #30 mcp-use 64.7 +1.0
  2. #31 n8n-MCP 63.8 +0.1
  3. #32 CodeGraph 63.7 this agent
  4. #33 A2UI 63.5 −0.2
  5. #34 mcphub 63.5 −0.2

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks CodeGraph’s 63.7.

Where the 63.7 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Protocols & Tool Integration average

63.7 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

CodeGraph Protocols & Tool Integration average (62 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
8.4 / 25
2.5 below avg 10.9
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
1.0 below avg 11.8
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
10.8 / 17
2.2 below avg 13.0
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
20.0 / 20
6.0 above avg 14.0
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
11.7 / 20
0.6 above avg 11.1

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-10-10
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#560 → #548)
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#550 → #560)
2026-10-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#531 → #542)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 2.7/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for CodeGraph View Protocols & Tool Integration Report missing data
96.3
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#32
In Protocols & Tool Integration

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-10-11 16:06 UTC · Repo last pushed today

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-11

Activity & Reach

Stars
73.7k
Forks
4.8k
Last Push
2026-10-11
today
Commits (4 wk)
395
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
151
Rank Change
▲3
was #548

Analysis

Activity Inputs

96.3 / 100
StarsRepository reach
29.2 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
17.1 / 20

Common questions about CodeGraph

CodeGraph has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does CodeGraph publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for CodeGraph. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does CodeGraph have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
CodeGraph has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 2.7/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is CodeGraph actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does CodeGraph use?
CodeGraph ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are CodeGraph's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to CodeGraph are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
CodeGraph appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to CodeGraph's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain CodeGraph?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores CodeGraph from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 20Listed 2HVTrust 2Grade 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1MCP 1
2026-10-10
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#560 → #548)
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#550 → #560)
2026-10-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#531 → #542)
2026-09-30
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#542 → #531)
2026-09-28
Rank Moved
Rank rose 33 spots (#571 → #538)
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 186 spots (#375 → #561)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 13.9pts (48.4 → 62.3)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #375
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 22 spots (#578 → #556)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#553 → #563)
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank rose 31 spots (#579 → #548)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank rose 19 spots (#598 → #579)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 44 spots (#554 → #598)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#536 → #554)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 72 spots (#464 → #536)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#439 → #464)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#415 → #439)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#405 → #415)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#395 → #405)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#371 → #395)
2026-08-29
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.0/10
2026-08-29
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank rose 596 spots (#974 → #378)
2026-08-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 32.3pts (28.1 → 60.4)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 36 spots (#938 → #974)
2026-08-27
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #938
GitHub → Website →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 63.7 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/codegraph.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/codegraph)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/codegraph"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/codegraph.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Protocols & Tool Integration

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON