ClickHouse

Connect ClickHouse to your AI assistants.

MCP Servers Python Grade B Listed Apache-2.0
65.4/100
Rank #222 of 1283
Compare ClickHouse

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-05 · 7d ago
Recent change
Rank +1

Is ClickHouse safe? ClickHouse scores 65.4/100 (Grade B), ranked #222 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 81% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-05. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.
Recent Changes
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#203 → #220)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #200
Maintainer Checklist
Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.
62.0
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#65

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC · Repo last pushed 7 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-12

Activity & Reach

Stars
846
Forks
197
Last Push
2026-08-05
7 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
5?
Downloads (7d)
46,873
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
23
Rank Change
▼1
was #221

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

65.4 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

ClickHouse MCP Servers average (761 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
11.5 / 25
6.5 above avg 5.0
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.7 above avg 13.3
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
8.5 / 17
in line with avg 8.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
13.1 / 20
0.7 above avg 12.4
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
13.3 / 20
7.5 above avg 5.8

Activity Inputs

62.0 / 100
StarsRepository reach
17.6 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
9.7 / 25
CommunityFork signal
10.7 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
pypi attestation
OSSF Scorecard
Not available
Signed Commits
81%
of last 100 commits verified

Is ClickHouse safe?

ClickHouse has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does ClickHouse publish package provenance?
Yes. ClickHouse's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does ClickHouse have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for ClickHouse. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is ClickHouse actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 7 day(s).
What license does ClickHouse use?
ClickHouse ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are ClickHouse's commits signed?
80% of the last 100 commits to ClickHouse are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
ClickHouse appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
low confidence
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
low confidence
Unknown
Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain ClickHouse?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores ClickHouse from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Listed 1Rank 1
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#203 → #220)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #200

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 65.4 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/clickhouse.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/clickhouse)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/clickhouse"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/clickhouse.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON