Claude Code Agent Monitor

🚀 A real-time monitoring dashboard for Claude Code & Codex, built with SQLite3, Node.js, Express, React, Vite, TailwindCSS, & WebSockets. It tracks sessions, agent activity, tool usage, and subagent orchestration, providing live analytics, a Kanban status board, status notifications, a cute buddy…

Agent Skills TypeScript Listed MIT

Is Claude Code Agent Monitor safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 17%
Last push today
Compare Claude Code Agent Monitor
Suggest a correction

In detail: Claude Code Agent Monitor scores 59.3/100 (Grade C), ranked #113 of 371 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.3/10; 17% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-10-10. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Claude Code Agent Monitor could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Claude Code Agent Monitor and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities and, for skills, AST02 Supply Chain Compromise.

  1. Source Partly signed

    github.com/hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor, MIT, last pushed 2026-10-10. 17% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Mixed

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 5.3/10 (scanned Oct 10, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review7
    • Branch Protection4
    • Signed Releases0
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions0
    • Pinned Dependencies9
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 4
    CI-Tests 10
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 7
    Contributors 10
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 0
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 10
    Packaging 10
    Pinned-Dependencies 9
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 10
    Signed-Releases 0
    Token-Permissions 0
    Vulnerabilities 0
  3. Published packages None

    No registry package. Claude Code Agent Monitor is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-08-29 OSSF Scorecard: 5.3/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads (missing)
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Claude Code Agent Monitor’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read the skill’s instructions for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you install it, such as Cisco Skill Scanner.

How Claude Code Agent Monitor compares in Agent Skills

  1. #111 Jeffallan Claude Skills 59.5 +0.2
  2. #112 Claude Ads 59.4 +0.1
  3. #113 Claude Code Agent Monitor 59.3 this agent
  4. #114 AI company 59.3 ±0
  5. #115 Tech Leads Club Agent Skills 59.2 −0.1

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Claude Code Agent Monitor’s 59.3.

Where the 59.3 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

59.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Claude Code Agent Monitor Agent Skills average (371 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
7.5 / 25
in line with avg 7.8
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.6 below avg 11.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.0 / 17
1.0 above avg 12.0
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
20.0 / 20
5.9 above avg 14.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
7.3 / 20
1.7 below avg 9.0

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.3/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
79.3
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#113

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-10-10 20:07 UTC · Repo last pushed today

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-10

Activity & Reach

Stars
1.1k
Forks
246
Last Push
2026-10-10
today
Commits (4 wk)
146
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
22
Rank Change
▼2
was #111

Analysis

Activity Inputs

79.3 / 100
StarsRepository reach
18.2 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
11.1 / 20

Common questions about Claude Code Agent Monitor

Claude Code Agent Monitor has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Claude Code Agent Monitor publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Claude Code Agent Monitor. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Claude Code Agent Monitor have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Claude Code Agent Monitor has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Claude Code Agent Monitor actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Claude Code Agent Monitor use?
Claude Code Agent Monitor ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Claude Code Agent Monitor's commits signed?
17% of the last 100 commits to Claude Code Agent Monitor are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Claude Code Agent Monitor appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Claude Code Agent Monitor's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain Claude Code Agent Monitor?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Claude Code Agent Monitor from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 5Listed 2HVTrust 2Grade 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1MCP 1Surface 1Surface 1
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 52 spots (#42 → #94)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 10.3pts (49.5 → 59.8)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #42
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#62 → #81)
2026-08-29
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 5.3/10
2026-08-29
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank rose 132 spots (#178 → #46)
2026-08-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 34.8pts (24.3 → 59.1)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#156 → #178)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#137 → #156)
2026-08-26
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #137

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 59.3 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/claude-code-agent-monitor.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/claude-code-agent-monitor)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/claude-code-agent-monitor"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/claude-code-agent-monitor.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON