Chat Nio

🚀 Next Gen Multi-tenant AI One-Stop Solution. Builtin Admin & Billing System. Enterprise-Grade Unified LLM Gateway Suppo

LLM Gateways & Infra TypeScript Grade D Listed Apache-2.0
36.3/100
Rank #391 of 468
Compare Chat Nio

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-03-12 · 147d ago
Recent change
No recent signal change

Is Chat Nio safe? Chat Nio scores 36.3/100 (Grade D), ranked #391 of 468 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.2/10; 50% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-03-12. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in LLM Gateways & Infra

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-07-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#380 → #390)
2026-07-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#348 → #373)
2026-07-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#329 → #348)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.2/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 147 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
42.8
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#11

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-06 05:00 UTC · Repo last pushed 147 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-07-05 2026-08-06

Activity & Reach

Stars
9.3k
Forks
1.2k
Last Push
2026-03-12
147 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
24
Rank Change
=
was #391

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs LLM Gateways & Infra

36.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Chat Nio LLM Gateways & Infra average (11 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
6.5 / 25
5.3 below avg 11.8
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
1.3 below avg 12.1
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.2 / 17
1.6 below avg 12.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
2.2 / 20
14.7 below avg 16.9
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
9.5 / 20
5.0 below avg 14.5

Activity Inputs

42.8 / 100
StarsRepository reach
23.8 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
4.6 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
14.3 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
3.2 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 5, 2026
Signed Commits
50%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests 0
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 0
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases 8
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is Chat Nio safe?

Public trust evidence for Chat Nio is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Chat Nio publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Chat Nio. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Chat Nio have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Chat Nio has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.2/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Chat Nio actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 147 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does Chat Nio use?
Chat Nio ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Chat Nio's commits signed?
50% of the last 100 commits to Chat Nio are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
5 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Marketplace
Marketplace plugin/integration surface detected.
  • code
  • database
  • search
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Chat Nio?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Chat Nio from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 8Listed 1HVTrust 1Scorecard 1
2026-07-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#380 → #390)
2026-07-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#348 → #373)
2026-07-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#329 → #348)
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 37 spots (#292 → #329)
2026-06-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#234 → #265)
2026-06-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#216 → #234)
2026-06-22
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#206 → #216)
2026-06-21
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.2/10
2026-06-21
Rank Moved
Rank rose 59 spots (#265 → #206)
2026-06-21
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 25.0pts (18.3 → 43.3)
2026-06-20
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #265

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 36.3 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/chat-nio.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/chat-nio)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/chat-nio"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/chat-nio.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in LLM Gateways & Infra

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON