Cc Thingz
various things for claude code
Is Cc Thingz safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
Compare Cc Thingz
How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: Cc Thingz scores 54.5/100 (Grade C), ranked #182 of 371 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.5/10; 84% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-10-05. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How Cc Thingz could raise its score
Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.
- Raise the OSSF Scorecard from 5.5 to 9.0lowest checks: CII-Best-Practices 0, Dependency-Update-Tool 0, Fuzzing 0 +7.2 → 61.7 C · #88 of 371
- Sign every commit84% signed today +0.8 → 55.3 C · #163 of 371
Chain of custody
Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Cc Thingz and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities and, for skills, AST02 Supply Chain Compromise.
-
Source Signed
github.com/umputun/cc-thingz, MIT, last pushed 2026-10-05. 84% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature, so changes trace to a verified account.
-
Review and release Mixed
OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 5.5/10 (scanned Oct 9, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:
- Code Review3
- Branch Protection3
- Signed Releasesn/a
- Dangerous Workflow10
- Token Permissions10
- Pinned Dependencies0
All 18 Scorecard checks
Binary-Artifacts 10Branch-Protection 3CI-Tests 7CII-Best-Practices 0Code-Review 3Contributors 10Dangerous-Workflow 10Dependency-Update-Tool 0Fuzzing 0License 10Maintained 10Packaging -1Pinned-Dependencies 0SAST 0Security-Policy 0Signed-Releases -1Token-Permissions 10Vulnerabilities 10 -
Published packages None
No registry package. Cc Thingz is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.
Changes to this chain
- 2026-08-30 OSSF Scorecard: 5.4/10
Evidence behind this score
Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.
- GitHub repository data
- Package downloads (missing)
- Supply-chain checks
- Public actions (missing)
- Community mentions (missing)
Verify this score yourself
Every build re-issues Cc Thingz’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.
What this score doesn’t check
It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read the skill’s instructions for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you install it, such as Cisco Skill Scanner.
How Cc Thingz compares in Agent Skills
- #180 Cc Sdd 54.7 +0.2
- #181 SwiftUI Agent Skill 54.6 +0.1
- #182 Cc Thingz 54.5 this agent
- #183 Headcount 54.5 ±0
- #184 Claude Howto 54.5 ±0
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Cc Thingz’s 54.5.
Where the 54.5 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average
54.5 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceCc Thingz Agent Skills average (371 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
54.0 / 100Common questions about Cc Thingz
Does Cc Thingz publish package provenance?
Does Cc Thingz have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Cc Thingz actively maintained?
What license does Cc Thingz use?
Are Cc Thingz's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to Cc Thingz's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain Cc Thingz?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Cc Thingz from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/cc-thingz)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/cc-thingz"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/cc-thingz.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in Agent Skills
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON