BrowserSkill
Let AI agents use your real, logged-in browser without interrupting your work. CLI + extension for browser automation across any shell-capable AI agent.
Is BrowserSkill safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
Compare BrowserSkill
How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: BrowserSkill scores 25.1/100 (Grade D), ranked #349 of 359 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage D (1 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 29% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-29. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How BrowserSkill could raise its score
Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.
- Raise the OSSF Scorecard to 9.0no OSSF Scorecard result yet +43.9 → 69.0 B · #37 of 359
- Sign every commit29% signed today +1.7 → 26.8 D · #348 of 359
How BrowserSkill compares in Agent Skills
- #347 Adversarial Spec 27.8 +2.7
- #348 Clawhub 25.6 +0.5
- #349 BrowserSkill 25.1 this agent
- #350 Skill Recorder 24.1 −1.0
- #351 Obsidian Skills 23.3 −1.8
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks BrowserSkill’s 25.1.
Where the 25.1 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average
25.1 / 100 · 50.0% confidenceBrowserSkill Agent Skills average (359 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage D is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (1 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
86.2 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about BrowserSkill
Does BrowserSkill publish package provenance?
Does BrowserSkill have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is BrowserSkill actively maintained?
What license does BrowserSkill use?
Are BrowserSkill's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Maintain BrowserSkill?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores BrowserSkill from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/browserskill)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/browserskill"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/browserskill.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in Agent Skills
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON