Browser Act Skills
Website
Browser automation CLI built for AI agents. Break through anti-bot walls, hand off to humans across platforms when stuck. Parallel multi-task execution, independent multi-session operation, isolated multi-account browsing.
Is Browser Act Skills safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
Compare Browser Act Skills
How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: Browser Act Skills scores 48.9/100 (Grade D), ranked #276 of 384 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.6/10; 2% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-11-04. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How Browser Act Skills could raise its score
Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.
- Raise the OSSF Scorecard from 3.6 to 9.0lowest checks: Branch-Protection 0, CII-Best-Practices 0, Code-Review 0 +11.2 → 60.1 C · #107 of 384
- Sign every commit2% signed today +4.9 → 53.8 C · #203 of 384
Chain of custody
Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Browser Act Skills and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities and, for skills, AST02 Supply Chain Compromise.
-
Source Partly signed
github.com/browser-act/skills, MIT, last pushed 2026-11-04. 2% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.
-
Review and release Weak
OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 3.6/10 (scanned Nov 8, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:
- Code Review0
- Branch Protection0
- Signed Releasesn/a
- Dangerous Workflow10
- Token Permissions0
- Pinned Dependencies0
All 18 Scorecard checks
Binary-Artifacts 10Branch-Protection 0CI-Tests -1CII-Best-Practices 0Code-Review 0Contributors 6Dangerous-Workflow 10Dependency-Update-Tool 0Fuzzing 0License 10Maintained 4Packaging -1Pinned-Dependencies 0SAST 0Security-Policy 0Signed-Releases -1Token-Permissions 0Vulnerabilities 10 -
Published packages None
No registry package. Browser Act Skills is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.
Changes to this chain
- 2026-09-08 OSSF Scorecard: 4.1/10
Evidence behind this score
Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.
- GitHub repository data
- Package downloads (missing)
- Supply-chain checks
- Public actions (missing)
- Community mentions (missing)
Verify this score yourself
Every build re-issues Browser Act Skills’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.
What this score doesn’t check
It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read the skill’s instructions for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you install it, such as Cisco Skill Scanner.
How Browser Act Skills compares in Agent Skills
- #274 Acontext 49.0 +0.1
- #275 Product Manager Skills 48.9 ±0
- #276 Browser Act Skills 48.9 this agent
- #277 The Startup 48.9 ±0
- #278 Attention Span 48.8 −0.1
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Browser Act Skills’s 48.9.
Where the 48.9 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average
48.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceBrowser Act Skills Agent Skills average (384 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
66.4 / 100Common questions about Browser Act Skills
Does Browser Act Skills publish package provenance?
Does Browser Act Skills have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Browser Act Skills actively maintained?
What license does Browser Act Skills use?
Are Browser Act Skills's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Maintain Browser Act Skills?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Browser Act Skills from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/browser-act-skills)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/browser-act-skills"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/browser-act-skills.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in Agent Skills
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON