updated 2026-08-04 02:30 UTC

BitFun

GCWing/BitFun

BitFun is a desktop-grade Agent runtimeand a ready-to-use suite of desktop Agent applications.with built-in Code Agent 、

Agent Frameworks Rust Grade D Listed MIT
23.1/100
Rank #437 of 468
Compare BitFun

How does it stack up against its Agent Frameworks neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade D · 1/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-04 · 0d ago
Recent change
New

Is BitFun safe? BitFun scores 23.1/100 (Grade D), ranked #437 of 468 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage D (1 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 7% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-04. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Agent Frameworks

#90 AIlice — 23.5 (D) → #91 mcp-agent — 23.3 (D) → #93 openagent — 23.0 (D) → #94 chidori — 22.6 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.
Recent Changes
2026-08-03
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #438
Maintainer Checklist
Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for BitFun View Agent Frameworks Report missing data
79.2
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#92
In Agent Frameworks

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage D is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (1 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-04 02:30 UTC · Repo last pushed today

Rank Trend

2026-08-03 2026-08-04

Activity & Reach

Stars
1.4k
Forks
163
Last Push
2026-08-04
today
Commits (4 wk)
741
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
45
Rank Change
▲1
was #438

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Agent Frameworks

23.1 / 100 · 50.0% confidence

BitFun Agent Frameworks average (103 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
0.4 / 25
8.6 below avg 9.0
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.9 below avg 11.7
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
8.5 / 17
3.5 below avg 12.0
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
20.0 / 20
5.4 above avg 14.6
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
7.6 / 20
4.3 below avg 11.9

Activity Inputs

79.2 / 100
StarsRepository reach
18.9 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
10.3 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
—
Not available
Signed Commits
7%
of last 100 commits verified

Is BitFun safe?

Public trust evidence for BitFun is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does BitFun publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for BitFun. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does BitFun have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for BitFun. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is BitFun actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does BitFun use?
BitFun ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are BitFun's commits signed?
7% of the last 100 commits to BitFun are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Declared
MCP support appears present, but direct server implementation is less certain.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
medium confidence
Extensions
Extension based plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain BitFun?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores BitFun from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Listed 1
2026-08-03
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #438
GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 23.1 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/bitfun.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/bitfun)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/bitfun"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/bitfun.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Frameworks

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON