Basic

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 面向 AI 编程的管理系统框架,兼容PC、移动端。AI-oriented management system framework, compatible with PC and mobile device.

Agent Skills Vue Listed MIT

Is Basic safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 3.3 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 0%
Last push 27d ago
Compare Basic
Suggest a correction

In detail: Basic scores 48.0/100 (Grade D), ranked #262 of 351 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.3/10; recent commits are unsigned; last pushed 2026-08-30. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Basic compares in Agent Skills

  1. #260 Autoresearch 48.0 ±0
  2. #261 Product Manager Skills 48.0 ±0
  3. #262 Basic 48.0 this agent
  4. #263 Cc Fleet 47.9 −0.1
  5. #264 Baoyu Skills 47.8 −0.2

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Basic’s 48.0.

Where the 48.0 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

48.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Basic Agent Skills average (351 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
4.1 / 25
4.0 below avg 8.1
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.6 below avg 11.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.3 / 17
0.9 below avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
13.3 / 20
0.9 below avg 14.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
8.5 / 20
in line with avg 9.0

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#237 → #261)
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 81 spots (#156 → #237)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 8.4pts (39.8 → 48.2)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.3/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
64.4
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#262

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-26 06:32 UTC · Repo last pushed 27 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
3.4k
Forks
397
Last Push
2026-08-30
27 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
5
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
▼1
was #261

Analysis

Activity Inputs

64.4 / 100
StarsRepository reach
21.2 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
21.2 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
9.7 / 25
CommunityFork signal
12.1 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
3.3 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 18, 2026
Signed Commits
0%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests -1
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases 0
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 3

Common questions about Basic

Public trust evidence for Basic is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Basic publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Basic. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Basic have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Basic has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Basic actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 27 days ago.
What license does Basic use?
Basic ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Basic's commits signed?
0% of the last 100 commits to Basic are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Basic?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Basic from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 12Listed 2HVTrust 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#237 → #261)
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 81 spots (#156 → #237)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 8.4pts (39.8 → 48.2)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #156
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#215 → #226)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#181 → #193)
2026-09-02
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.3/10
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank rose 120 spots (#289 → #169)
2026-09-02
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 26.7pts (21.6 → 48.3)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#279 → #289)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#269 → #279)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#255 → #269)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#235 → #255)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#221 → #234)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 105 spots (#116 → #221)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#103 → #114)
2026-08-11
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #106

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 48.0 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/basic.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/basic)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/basic"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/basic.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON