Automox MCP Server
An MCP server implementation for Automox
Is Automox MCP Server safe? Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.
Compare Automox MCP Server
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
- MCP Adr Analysis Server +0.1 higher
- Native DevTools +0.1 higher
- The MCP server for GoReleaser same score
In detail: Automox MCP Server scores 77.7/100 (Grade B), ranked #178 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 7.6/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-19. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How Automox MCP Server compares in MCP Servers
- #96 MCP Adr Analysis Server 77.8 +0.1
- #97 Native DevTools 77.8 +0.1
- #98 Automox MCP Server 77.7 this agent
- #99 The MCP server for GoReleaser 77.7 ±0
- #100 MCP Youtube 77.7 ±0
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Automox MCP Server’s 77.7.
Where the 77.7 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
77.7 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceAutomox MCP Server MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
38.8 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about Automox MCP Server
Does Automox MCP Server publish package provenance?
Does Automox MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Automox MCP Server actively maintained?
What license does Automox MCP Server use?
Are Automox MCP Server's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to Automox MCP Server's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain Automox MCP Server?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Automox MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/automox-mcp-server)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/automox-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/automox-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON