updated 2026-10-10 20:07 UTC

Arcgentic

Repository

Mechanical plan/dev/self-audit/external-audit gates for AI coding agents, with a configurable role-routing topology engine, an MCP-UI live status panel, and native-tooling Claude Code V2 dispatch. Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw, and PyPI.

Agent Skills Python Listed MIT

Is Arcgentic safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10
Provenance Attested
Signed commits 0%
Last push 8d ago
Advisories None known
Compare Arcgentic

How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: Arcgentic scores 70.7/100 (Grade B), ranked #29 of 371 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.7/10; recent commits are unsigned; no published advisory affects its latest release (arcgentic); last pushed 2026-10-02. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Arcgentic could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Already done? Suggest a correctionAdd the trust badge

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Arcgentic and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities and, for skills, AST02 Supply Chain Compromise.

  1. Source Unsigned

    github.com/Arch1eSUN/Arcgentic, MIT, last pushed 2026-10-02. None of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature, so no change traces to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Mixed

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 4.7/10 (scanned Oct 6, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review0
    • Branch Protection0
    • Signed Releases0
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions10
    • Pinned Dependencies0
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 0
    CI-Tests -1
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 0
    Contributors 3
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 0
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 10
    Packaging 10
    Pinned-Dependencies 0
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 0
    Signed-Releases 0
    Token-Permissions 10
    Vulnerabilities 10

  3. Published packages Linked and attested

    • npm arcgentic Source link points back to this repo Build provenance attested

  4. What you install today No known advisories

    Latest release checked: arcgentic 2.2.1. No published advisory affects it (OSV, checked 2026-10-10).

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-09-23 Package provenance attestation detected
  • 2026-09-02 OSSF Scorecard: 4.7/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Arcgentic’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

Signed credential (JSON) How to verify

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read the skill’s instructions for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you install it, such as Cisco Skill Scanner.

How Arcgentic compares in Agent Skills

  1. #27 Computer Use Linux 73.0 +2.3
  2. #28 Dev Browser 72.4 +1.7
  3. #29 Arcgentic 70.7 this agent
  4. #30 Container 70.3 −0.4
  5. #31 SkillOpt 70.2 −0.5

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Arcgentic’s 70.7.

Where the 70.7 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

70.7 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Arcgentic Agent Skills average (371 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
13.4 / 25
5.6 above avg 7.8
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
6.6 above avg 11.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.5 / 17
in line with avg 12.0
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
13.2 / 20
0.9 below avg 14.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
7.9 / 20
1.1 below avg 9.0

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Increase the share of verified signed commits for clearer maintainer identity.
Recent Changes
2026-10-02
Rank Moved
Rank rose 28 spots (#59 → #31)
2026-10-02
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 5.0pts (65.1 → 70.1)
2026-10-02
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 17pts (38 → 55)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.7/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Arcgentic View Agent Skills Report missing data
53.9
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#29
In Agent Skills

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-10-10 20:07 UTC · Repo last pushed 8 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-10

Activity & Reach

Stars
286
Forks
10
Last Push
2026-10-02
8 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
6?
Downloads (7d)
32
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
=
was #29

Analysis

Activity Inputs

53.9 / 100
StarsRepository reach
14.7 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
23.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
10.5 / 25
CommunityFork signal
4.8 / 20

Common questions about Arcgentic

Arcgentic has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Arcgentic publish package provenance?
Yes. Arcgentic's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does Arcgentic have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Arcgentic has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.7/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Arcgentic actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 8 days ago.
What license does Arcgentic use?
Arcgentic ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Arcgentic's commits signed?
0% of the last 100 commits to Arcgentic are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Arcgentic appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
medium confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Arcgentic's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected

Maintain Arcgentic?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Arcgentic from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
HVTrust 7Rank 7Grade 6Listed 2Score 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1Provenance 1MCP 1Surface 1Surface 1
2026-10-02
Rank Moved
Rank rose 28 spots (#59 → #31)
2026-10-02
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 5.0pts (65.1 → 70.1)
2026-10-02
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 17pts (38 → 55)
2026-09-27
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 257 spots (#318 → #61)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 40.8pts (23.9 → 64.7)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #318
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#26 → #44)
2026-09-11
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 6.8pts (73.4 → 66.6)
2026-09-11
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 21pts (62 → 40)
2026-09-05
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank rose 140 spots (#160 → #20)
2026-09-05
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 23.6pts (50.4 → 74.0)
2026-09-02
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.7/10
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 111 spots (#37 → #148)
2026-09-02
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 13.9pts (64.4 → 50.5)
2026-08-31
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank rose 123 spots (#155 → #32)
2026-08-31
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 20.4pts (44.0 → 64.4)
2026-08-30
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → D
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 128 spots (#27 → #155)
2026-08-30
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 20.6pts (64.6 → 44.0)
2026-08-27
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → C
2026-08-26
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #21
GitHub → npm: arcgentic

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 70.7 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/arcgentic.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/arcgentic)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/arcgentic"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/arcgentic.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON