AntV Chart MCP Server

🤖 A visualization mcp & skills contains 25+ visual charts using @antvis. Using for chart generation and data analysis.

MCP Servers TypeScript Listed MIT

Is AntV Chart MCP Server safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 98%
Last push 45d ago
Advisories None known
Compare AntV Chart MCP Server
Suggest a correction

In detail: AntV Chart MCP Server scores 63.3/100 (Grade C), ranked #559 of 1371 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.0/10; 98% of recent commits are signed; no published advisory affects its latest release (@antv/mcp-server-chart); last pushed 2026-08-27. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How AntV Chart MCP Server could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships AntV Chart MCP Server and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Signed

    github.com/antvis/mcp-server-chart, MIT, last pushed 2026-08-27. 98% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature, so changes trace to a verified account.

  2. Review and release Mixed

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 5.0/10 (scanned Oct 10, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review5
    • Branch Protection3
    • Signed Releasesn/a
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions0
    • Pinned Dependencies0
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 3
    CI-Tests 10
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 5
    Contributors 10
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 0
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 4
    Packaging -1
    Pinned-Dependencies 0
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 10
    Signed-Releases -1
    Token-Permissions 0
    Vulnerabilities 10
  3. Published packages Linked, not attested

    Without a build attestation, nothing proves the published files were built from this repository.

  4. What you install today No known advisories

    Latest release checked: @antv/mcp-server-chart 0.9.10. No published advisory affects it (OSV, checked 2026-10-11).

Changes to this chain

No change to package provenance, package source links, Scorecard coverage or license in HVTracker's daily snapshots of AntV Chart MCP Server.

Evidence behind this score

Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues AntV Chart MCP Server’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How AntV Chart MCP Server compares in MCP Servers

  1. #308 MITRE ATT&CK 63.4 +0.1
  2. #309 Cyberbro MCP Server 63.4 +0.1
  3. #310 AntV Chart MCP Server 63.3 this agent
  4. #311 Unity MCP 63.3 ±0
  5. #312 Google Maps MCP Server 63.3 ±0

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks AntV Chart MCP Server’s 63.3.

Where the 63.3 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

63.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

AntV Chart MCP Server MCP Servers average (781 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
11.2 / 25
0.8 above avg 10.4
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.7 below avg 13.5
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.8 / 17
0.6 above avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
9.0 / 20
3.2 below avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
13.5 / 20
6.1 above avg 7.4

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#543 → #562)
2026-10-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#519 → #530)
2026-09-26
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → C
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.0/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 45 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
52.9
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#310

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-10-11 04:08 UTC · Repo last pushed 45 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-11

Activity & Reach

Stars
4.4k
Forks
422
Last Push
2026-08-27
45 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
4,025
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
4
Rank Change
▼5
was #554

Analysis

Activity Inputs

52.9 / 100
StarsRepository reach
21.9 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
18.8 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
12.2 / 20

Common questions about AntV Chart MCP Server

AntV Chart MCP Server has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does AntV Chart MCP Server publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for AntV Chart MCP Server. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does AntV Chart MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
AntV Chart MCP Server has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.0/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is AntV Chart MCP Server actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 45 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does AntV Chart MCP Server use?
AntV Chart MCP Server ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are AntV Chart MCP Server's commits signed?
98% of the last 100 commits to AntV Chart MCP Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
AntV Chart MCP Server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to AntV Chart MCP Server's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-19
Activity Resumed
Activity resumed
2026-08-12
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: marketplace → none
2026-08-04
Activity Went Stale
No commits for 90 days

Maintain AntV Chart MCP Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores AntV Chart MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 25HVTrust 2Grade 2Stale 1Surface 1Score 1Fresh 1
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#543 → #562)
2026-10-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#519 → #530)
2026-09-26
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → C
2026-09-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 33 spots (#458 → #491)
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 273 spots (#174 → #447)
2026-09-21
Rank Moved
Rank rose 263 spots (#439 → #176)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#398 → #415)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#364 → #379)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#351 → #364)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 64 spots (#287 → #351)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#278 → #296)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 29 spots (#243 → #272)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#237 → #248)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank rose 15 spots (#249 → #234)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#227 → #249)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#206 → #224)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 16 spots (#224 → #208)
2026-08-19
Activity Resumed
Activity resumed
2026-08-19
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank rose 118 spots (#341 → #223)
2026-08-19
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 6.7pts (58.9 → 65.6)
2026-08-19
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 14pts (45 → 59)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 15 spots (#359 → #344)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#346 → #359)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#323 → #340)
2026-08-12
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: marketplace → none
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 32 spots (#355 → #323)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#334 → #353)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#298 → #316)
2026-08-08
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 4.8pts (55.0 → 59.8)
2026-08-04
Activity Went Stale
No commits for 90 days
2026-07-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#182 → #197)
2026-07-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#163 → #182)

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 63.3 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/antv-chart-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/antv-chart-mcp-server)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/antv-chart-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/antv-chart-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON