AntV Chart MCP Server

🤖 A visualization mcp & skills contains 25+ visual charts using @antvis. Using for chart generation and data analysis.

MCP Servers TypeScript Grade B Listed MIT
66.5/100
Rank #224 of 1314
Compare AntV Chart MCP Server

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-27 · 0d ago
Recent change
Rank +3

Is AntV Chart MCP Server safe? AntV Chart MCP Server scores 66.5/100 (Grade B), ranked #224 of 1314 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.9/10; 98% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-27. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank rose 25 spots (#249 → #224)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#227 → #249)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#206 → #224)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.9/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
62.8
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#74

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-27 02:32 UTC · Repo last pushed today

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-27

Activity & Reach

Stars
4.3k
Forks
417
Last Push
2026-08-27
today
Commits (4 wk)
1?
Downloads (7d)
3,215
npm
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
4
Rank Change
▲25
was #249

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

66.5 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

AntV Chart MCP Server MCP Servers average (777 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
11.0 / 25
4.8 above avg 6.2
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.5 below avg 13.3
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.7 / 17
3.1 above avg 9.6
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
12.6 / 20
in line with avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
13.4 / 20
7.6 above avg 5.8

Activity Inputs

62.8 / 100
StarsRepository reach
21.8 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
3.8 / 25
CommunityFork signal
12.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
4.9 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 24, 2026
Signed Commits
98%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 3
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 5
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 2
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 10

Is AntV Chart MCP Server safe?

AntV Chart MCP Server has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does AntV Chart MCP Server publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for AntV Chart MCP Server. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does AntV Chart MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
AntV Chart MCP Server has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.9/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is AntV Chart MCP Server actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does AntV Chart MCP Server use?
AntV Chart MCP Server ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are AntV Chart MCP Server's commits signed?
98% of the last 100 commits to AntV Chart MCP Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
AntV Chart MCP Server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to AntV Chart MCP Server's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-19
Activity Resumed
Activity resumed
2026-08-12
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: marketplace → none
2026-08-04
Activity Went Stale
No commits for 90 days
2026-07-13
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → marketplace
2026-07-13
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-07-13
Activity Resumed
Activity resumed

Maintain AntV Chart MCP Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores AntV Chart MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 14HVTrust 3Score 2Grade 2Fresh 2Surface 2Listed 1MCP 1Stale 1
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank rose 25 spots (#249 → #224)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#227 → #249)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#206 → #224)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 16 spots (#224 → #208)
2026-08-19
Activity Resumed
Activity resumed
2026-08-19
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank rose 118 spots (#341 → #223)
2026-08-19
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 6.7pts (58.9 → 65.6)
2026-08-19
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 14pts (45 → 59)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 15 spots (#359 → #344)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#346 → #359)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#323 → #340)
2026-08-12
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: marketplace → none
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 32 spots (#355 → #323)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#334 → #353)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#298 → #316)
2026-08-08
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 4.8pts (55.0 → 59.8)
2026-08-04
Activity Went Stale
No commits for 90 days
2026-07-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#182 → #197)
2026-07-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#163 → #182)
2026-07-13
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → marketplace
2026-07-13
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-07-13
Activity Resumed
Activity resumed
2026-07-13
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank rose 184 spots (#347 → #163)
2026-07-13
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 57.9pts (4.3 → 62.2)
2026-07-13
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 50pts (0 → 50)
2026-07-12
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #347

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 66.5 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/antv-chart-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/antv-chart-mcp-server)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/antv-chart-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/antv-chart-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON