Is AntV Chart MCP Server safe to use?

AntV Chart MCP Server has an HVTrust score of 59.4/100 (Grade C), ranked #344 of 1283 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for AntV Chart MCP Server?

AntV Chart MCP Server scores 59.4/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 4.3k GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

AntV Chart MCP Server

antvis/mcp-server-chart

🤖 A visualization mcp & skills contains 25+ visual charts using @antvis. Using for chart generation and data analysis.

MCP Servers TypeScript Grade C Listed MIT

59.4/100

Rank #344 of 1283

Compare AntV Chart MCP Server

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade B · 3/5 signals

Last push

2026-05-06 · 101d ago

Recent change

Rank +5

Is AntV Chart MCP Server safe? AntV Chart MCP Server scores 59.4/100 (Grade C), ranked #344 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.7/10; 98% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-05-06. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#114 Desktop Commander MCP — 59.6 (C) → #115 Cyberbro MCP Server — 59.6 (C) → #117 Web Researcher MCP — 59.2 (C) → #118 SearXNG Search — 59.1 (C) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-08-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 17 spots (#323 → #340)

2026-08-12

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: marketplace → none

2026-08-12

Rank Moved

Rank rose 32 spots (#355 → #323)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.7/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 101 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for AntV Chart MCP Server View MCP Servers Report missing data

45.0

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#116

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-15

Activity & Reach

Stars

4.3k

Forks

416

Last Push

2026-05-06

101 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

8,678

npm

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

was #344

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

59.4 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

AntV Chart MCP Server MCP Servers average (761 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

10.8 / 25

5.8 above avg 5.0

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

2.5 below avg 13.3

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

12.5 / 17

3.7 above avg 8.8

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

5.3 / 20

7.1 below avg 12.4

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

14.0 / 20

8.2 above avg 5.8

Activity Inputs

45.0 / 100

StarsRepository reach

21.8 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

11.0 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

0.0 / 25

CommunityFork signal

12.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

4.7 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 14, 2026

Signed Commits

98%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 3

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 5

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 0

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 10

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 10

Is AntV Chart MCP Server safe?

AntV Chart MCP Server has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does AntV Chart MCP Server publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for AntV Chart MCP Server. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does AntV Chart MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

AntV Chart MCP Server has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.7/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is AntV Chart MCP Server actively maintained?

Slowing down. Last push was 101 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.

What license does AntV Chart MCP Server use?

AntV Chart MCP Server ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are AntV Chart MCP Server's commits signed?

98% of the last 100 commits to AntV Chart MCP Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

AntV Chart MCP Server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

None detected

No clear third-party provider dependency detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to AntV Chart MCP Server's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-12

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: marketplace → none

2026-08-04

Activity Went Stale

No commits for 90 days

2026-07-13

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → marketplace

2026-07-13

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-07-13

Activity Resumed

Activity resumed

Maintain AntV Chart MCP Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores AntV Chart MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-08-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 17 spots (#323 → #340)

2026-08-12

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: marketplace → none

2026-08-12

Rank Moved

Rank rose 32 spots (#355 → #323)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 19 spots (#334 → #353)

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#298 → #316)

2026-08-08

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 4.8pts (55.0 → 59.8)

2026-08-04

Activity Went Stale

No commits for 90 days

2026-07-15

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#182 → #197)

2026-07-14

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 19 spots (#163 → #182)

2026-07-13

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → marketplace

2026-07-13

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-07-13

Activity Resumed

Activity resumed

2026-07-13

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-07-13

Rank Moved

Rank rose 184 spots (#347 → #163)

2026-07-13

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 57.9pts (4.3 → 62.2)

2026-07-13

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 50pts (0 → 50)

2026-07-12

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #347

GitHub → npm: @antv/mcp-server-chart

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/antv-chart-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/antv-chart-mcp-server)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/antv-chart-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/antv-chart-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON