AntOmniEvo
An auto-evolution framework that optimizes anything — your 7×24 team of algorithm engineers.
Is AntOmniEvo safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
Compare AntOmniEvo
How does it stack up against its Agent Frameworks neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: AntOmniEvo scores 23.1/100 (Grade D), ranked #1377 of 1387 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage D (1 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 41% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-11-05. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How AntOmniEvo could raise its score
Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.
- Raise the OSSF Scorecard to 9.0no OSSF Scorecard result yet +41.9 → 65.0 B · #47 of 134
- Sign every commit41% signed today +1.5 → 24.6 D · #128 of 134
Chain of custody
Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships AntOmniEvo and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.
-
Source Partly signed
github.com/ant-research/AntOmniEvo, Apache-2.0, last pushed 2026-11-05. 41% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.
-
Review and release Not checked
No OpenSSF Scorecard result yet, so branch protection, code review and release signing are unverified.
-
Published packages None
No registry package. AntOmniEvo is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.
Changes to this chain
No change to package provenance, package source links, Scorecard coverage or license in HVTracker's daily snapshots of AntOmniEvo.
Evidence behind this score
Coverage D: 1 of 5 independent evidence types found.
- GitHub repository data
- Package downloads (missing)
- Supply-chain checks (missing)
- Public actions (missing)
- Community mentions (missing)
Verify this score yourself
Every build re-issues AntOmniEvo’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.
What this score doesn’t check
It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.
How AntOmniEvo compares in Agent Frameworks
- #130 LearnHarness 24.0 +0.9
- #131 mcp-agent 23.5 +0.4
- #132 AntOmniEvo 23.1 this agent
- #133 AWorld 22.7 −0.4
- #134 AutoAgent 20.4 −2.7
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks AntOmniEvo’s 23.1.
Where the 23.1 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Frameworks average
23.1 / 100 · 50.0% confidenceAntOmniEvo Agent Frameworks average (134 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage D is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (1 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
70.7 / 100Common questions about AntOmniEvo
Does AntOmniEvo publish package provenance?
Does AntOmniEvo have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is AntOmniEvo actively maintained?
What license does AntOmniEvo use?
Are AntOmniEvo's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Maintain AntOmniEvo?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores AntOmniEvo from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/antomnievo)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/antomnievo"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/antomnievo.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in Agent Frameworks
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON