updated 2026-08-17 00:02 UTC

anti-slop

dmmulroy/anti-slop

Opinionated Oxlint rules for rejecting low-evidence TypeScript and JavaScript patterns

Agent Skills TypeScript Grade D Listed MIT
24.1/100
Rank #63 of 159
Compare anti-slop

How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade D · 1/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-14 · 3d ago
Recent change
New

Is anti-slop safe? anti-slop scores 24.1/100 (Grade D), ranked #63 of 159 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage D (1 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-14. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Agent Skills

#61 SenseNova Skills — 24.3 (D) → #62 Video Shotcraft — 24.3 (D) → #64 Claude Code Zh Cn — 24.1 (D) → #65 Claude Elixir Phoenix — 24.1 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.
Recent Changes
2026-08-16
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #63
Maintainer Checklist
Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for anti-slop View Agent Skills Report missing data
64.6
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#63
In Agent Skills

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage D is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (1 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-17 00:02 UTC · Repo last pushed 3 days ago

Activity & Reach

Stars
1.7k
Forks
26
Last Push
2026-08-14
3 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
12
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
=
was #63

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Agent Skills

24.1 / 100 · 50.0% confidence

anti-slop Agent Skills average (159 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
5.0 / 25
2.3 above avg 2.7
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.6 below avg 11.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
8.5 / 17
in line with avg 8.5
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
16.2 / 20
1.0 above avg 15.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
7.7 / 20
1.5 below avg 9.2

Activity Inputs

64.6 / 100
StarsRepository reach
19.3 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.6 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
13.9 / 25
CommunityFork signal
6.7 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
—
Not available
Signed Commits
100%
of last 100 commits verified

Is anti-slop safe?

Public trust evidence for anti-slop is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does anti-slop publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for anti-slop. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does anti-slop have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for anti-slop. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is anti-slop actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 3 day(s).
What license does anti-slop use?
anti-slop ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are anti-slop's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to anti-slop are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain anti-slop?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores anti-slop from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Listed 1
2026-08-16
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #63
GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 24.1 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/anti-slop.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/anti-slop)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/anti-slop"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/anti-slop.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON