Is AirMCP safe to use?

AirMCP has an HVTrust score of 53.2/100 (Grade C), ranked #427 of 1283 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for AirMCP?

AirMCP scores 53.2/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 16 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

AirMCP

heznpc/AirMCP

Governed MCP runtime for the Apple ecosystem — verified control over Notes, Mail, Calendar, Shortcuts, and more.

MCP Servers JavaScript Grade C Listed MIT

53.2/100

Rank #427 of 1283

Compare AirMCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade C · 2/5 signals

Last push

2026-08-11 · 1d ago

Recent change

Rank +1

Is AirMCP safe? AirMCP scores 53.2/100 (Grade C), ranked #427 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 6.9/10; 33% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-11. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#142 Scout MCP Local — 54.2 (C) → #143 Elasticsearch MCP Server — 53.4 (C) → #145 SearXNG HTTP MCP — 53.0 (C) → #146 Scrivener MCP — 52.8 (C) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Increase the share of verified signed commits for clearer maintainer identity.

Recent Changes

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#415 → #430)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #411

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 6.9/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for AirMCP View MCP Servers Report missing data

58.9

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#144

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-12

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-08-11

yesterday

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▲1

was #428

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

53.2 / 100 · 67.0% confidence

AirMCP MCP Servers average (761 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

17.8 / 25

12.8 above avg 5.0

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

18.0 / 18

4.7 above avg 13.3

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

14.4 / 17

5.6 above avg 8.8

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

19.5 / 20

7.1 above avg 12.4

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

3.0 / 20

2.8 below avg 5.8

Activity Inputs

58.9 / 100

StarsRepository reach

7.4 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.9 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

23.7 / 25

CommunityFork signal

2.8 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

Verified

npm attestation

OSSF Scorecard

6.9 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 8, 2026

Signed Commits

33%

of last 100 commits verified

Code-Review 1

Dependency-Update-Tool 10

Maintained 10

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Security-Policy 10

Token-Permissions 0

Binary-Artifacts 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Pinned-Dependencies 9

SAST 10

Vulnerabilities 9

Branch-Protection -1

License 10

Signed-Releases 0

Fuzzing 0

Packaging 10

Contributors 10

CI-Tests 10

Is AirMCP safe?

Public trust evidence for AirMCP is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does AirMCP publish package provenance?

Yes. AirMCP's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.

Does AirMCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

AirMCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 6.9/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is AirMCP actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).

What license does AirMCP use?

AirMCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are AirMCP's commits signed?

33% of the last 100 commits to AirMCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

AirMCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

1 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Anthropic

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

Maintain AirMCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores AirMCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#415 → #430)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #411

GitHub → npm: airmcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/airmcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/airmcp)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/airmcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/airmcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON