Is Airflow MCP Server safe to use?

Airflow MCP Server has an HVTrust score of 37.1/100 (Grade D), ranked #1100 of 1320 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Airflow MCP Server?

Airflow MCP Server scores 37.1/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 33 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

Airflow MCP Server

abhishekbhakat/airflow-mcp-server

MCP Server for Apache Airflow

MCP Servers Python Grade D Listed MIT

37.1/100

Rank #1100 of 1320

Compare Airflow MCP Server

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade B · 3/5 signals

Last push

2025-10-14 · 325d ago

Recent change

Scorecard +8

Is Airflow MCP Server safe? Airflow MCP Server scores 37.1/100 (Grade D), ranked #1100 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.0/10; 79% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2025-10-14. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#626 Paper Distill MCP — 37.4 (D) → #627 JustCall MCP Server — 37.2 (D) → #629 Mapbox MCP Server — 37.1 (D) → #630 Antrieb MCP Server — 37.0 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-03

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 3.0/10

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank rose 172 spots (#1263 → #1091)

2026-09-03

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 16.3pts (20.8 → 37.1)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.0/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 325 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Airflow MCP Server View MCP Servers Report missing data

13.6

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#628

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-04

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2025-10-14

325 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

235

pypi

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼9

was #1091

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

37.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Airflow MCP Server MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

7.7 / 25

1.8 below avg 9.5

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

2.6 below avg 13.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

11.1 / 17

0.7 below avg 11.8

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

0 / 20

12.2 below avg 12.2

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

6.8 / 20

0.6 above avg 6.2

Activity Inputs

13.6 / 100

StarsRepository reach

9.2 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

0.0 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

0.0 / 25

CommunityFork signal

4.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

3.0 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 3, 2026

Signed Commits

79%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 1

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 3

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 0

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Is Airflow MCP Server safe?

Public trust evidence for Airflow MCP Server is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does Airflow MCP Server publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Airflow MCP Server. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Airflow MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Airflow MCP Server has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.0/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Airflow MCP Server actively maintained?

Stale. The repository has not been pushed to in 325 days. Consider whether the project is still being maintained.

What license does Airflow MCP Server use?

Airflow MCP Server ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Airflow MCP Server's commits signed?

79% of the last 100 commits to Airflow MCP Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

Airflow MCP Server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

low confidence

None detected

No clear third-party provider dependency detected.

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

medium confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

low confidence

Unknown

Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

Maintain Airflow MCP Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Airflow MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-03

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 3.0/10

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank rose 172 spots (#1263 → #1091)

2026-09-03

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 16.3pts (20.8 → 37.1)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 28 spots (#1235 → #1263)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 21 spots (#1214 → #1235)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 23 spots (#1191 → #1214)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 28 spots (#1163 → #1191)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 29 spots (#1134 → #1163)

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 21 spots (#1113 → #1134)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 17 spots (#1096 → #1113)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 73 spots (#1023 → #1096)

2026-08-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 12 spots (#1037 → #1025)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 31 spots (#1006 → #1037)

2026-08-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#992 → #1004)

2026-08-12

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 31 spots (#961 → #992)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 60 spots (#895 → #955)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #940

GitHub → PyPI: airflow-mcp-server

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/airflow-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/airflow-mcp-server)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/airflow-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/airflow-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON