updated 2026-10-15 04:08 UTC

Ai Agent Team

Repository

AI Agent Team-拥有24/7专业AI开发团队：产品经理、前端开发、后端开发、测试工程师、DevOps工程师、技术负责人。一键安装，支持中英文命令，大幅提升开发效率！

Agent Skills JavaScript Listed MIT

Is Ai Agent Team safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 1.3 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 5%
Last push 108d ago
Advisories None known
Compare Ai Agent Team

How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: Ai Agent Team scores 40.9/100 (Grade D), ranked #334 of 371 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 1.3/10; 5% of recent commits are signed; no published advisory affects its latest release (ai-agent-team); last pushed 2026-06-29. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Ai Agent Team could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Already done? Suggest a correctionAdd the trust badge

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Ai Agent Team and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities and, for skills, AST02 Supply Chain Compromise.

  1. Source Partly signed

    github.com/peterfei/ai-agent-team, MIT, last pushed 2026-06-29. 5% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Weak

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 1.3/10 (scanned Oct 3, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review0
    • Branch Protection0
    • Signed Releases0
    • Dangerous Workflown/a
    • Token Permissionsn/a
    • Pinned Dependencies0
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 0
    CI-Tests -1
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 0
    Contributors 3
    Dangerous-Workflow -1
    Dependency-Update-Tool 0
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 0
    Packaging -1
    Pinned-Dependencies 0
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 0
    Signed-Releases 0
    Token-Permissions -1
    Vulnerabilities 0

  3. Published packages Linked, not attested

    • npm ai-agent-team Source link points back to this repo No build attestation

    Without a build attestation, nothing proves the published files were built from this repository.

  4. What you install today No known advisories

    Latest release checked: ai-agent-team 2.1.0. No published advisory affects it (OSV, checked 2026-10-15).

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-09-06 OSSF Scorecard: 1.8/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Ai Agent Team’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

Signed credential (JSON) How to verify

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read the skill’s instructions for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you install it, such as Cisco Skill Scanner.

How Ai Agent Team compares in Agent Skills

  1. #332 Oh Dsh 41.0 +0.1
  2. #333 Frontend Slides 40.9 ±0
  3. #334 Ai Agent Team 40.9 this agent
  4. #335 Claude For Financial Services Cn 40.7 −0.2
  5. #336 Tinte 40.5 −0.4

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Ai Agent Team’s 40.9.

Where the 40.9 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

40.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Ai Agent Team Agent Skills average (371 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
1.9 / 25
6.1 below avg 8.0
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.6 below avg 11.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
9.6 / 17
2.5 below avg 12.1
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
4.8 / 20
9.3 below avg 14.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
8.4 / 20
0.6 below avg 9.0

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-27
Activity Went Stale
No commits for 90 days
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 27 spots (#280 → #307)
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 1.3/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 108 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Ai Agent Team View Agent Skills Report missing data
34.6
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#334
In Agent Skills

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-10-15 04:08 UTC · Repo last pushed 108 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-15

Activity & Reach

Stars
442
Forks
68
Last Push
2026-06-29
108 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
36
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
▼5
was #329

Analysis

Activity Inputs

34.6 / 100
StarsRepository reach
15.9 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
10.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
8.6 / 20

Common questions about Ai Agent Team

Public trust evidence for Ai Agent Team is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Ai Agent Team publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Ai Agent Team. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Ai Agent Team have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Ai Agent Team has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 1.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Ai Agent Team actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 108 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does Ai Agent Team use?
Ai Agent Team ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Ai Agent Team's commits signed?
4% of the last 100 commits to Ai Agent Team are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Implemented
Ai Agent Team appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
medium confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
2 tags
Broad capability areas detected.
  • browser
  • filesystem
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Ai Agent Team's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-27
Activity Went Stale
No commits for 90 days
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain Ai Agent Team?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Ai Agent Team from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 8HVTrust 3Listed 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1MCP 1Surface 1Stale 1
2026-09-27
Activity Went Stale
No commits for 90 days
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 27 spots (#280 → #307)
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 64 spots (#344 → #280)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 25.4pts (17.4 → 42.8)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #344
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#245 → #261)
2026-09-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#235 → #245)
2026-09-06
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 1.8/10
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank rose 75 spots (#291 → #216)
2026-09-06
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 15.6pts (29.2 → 44.8)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank rose 35 spots (#310 → #275)
2026-09-03
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 10.5pts (18.8 → 29.3)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#285 → #295)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#273 → #285)
2026-08-26
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #260
GitHub → npm: ai-agent-team

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 40.9 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/ai-agent-team.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/ai-agent-team)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/ai-agent-team"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/ai-agent-team.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON