Agent Skills for Context Engineering

A comprehensive collection of Agent Skills for context engineering, multi-agent architectures, and production agent systems. Use when building, optimizing, or debugging agent systems that require effective context management.

Agent Skills Python Listed MIT

Is Agent Skills for Context Engineering safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 3.6 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 68%
Last push 30d ago
Compare Agent Skills for Context Engineering
Suggest a correction

In detail: Agent Skills for Context Engineering scores 52.1/100 (Grade C), ranked #234 of 396 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.6/10; 68% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-10-12. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Agent Skills for Context Engineering could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Agent Skills for Context Engineering and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities and, for skills, AST02 Supply Chain Compromise.

  1. Source Partly signed

    github.com/muratcankoylan/Agent-Skills-for-Context-Engineering, MIT, last pushed 2026-10-12. 68% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Weak

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 3.6/10 (scanned Nov 7, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review2
    • Branch Protection3
    • Signed Releases0
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions0
    • Pinned Dependencies6
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 3
    CI-Tests 8
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 2
    Contributors 0
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 0
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 10
    Packaging -1
    Pinned-Dependencies 6
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 0
    Signed-Releases 0
    Token-Permissions 0
    Vulnerabilities 0
  3. Published packages None

    No registry package. Agent Skills for Context Engineering is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-08-31 OSSF Scorecard: 3.6/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads (missing)
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Agent Skills for Context Engineering’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read the skill’s instructions for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you install it, such as Cisco Skill Scanner.

How Agent Skills for Context Engineering compares in Agent Skills

  1. #232 I Have Adhd 52.2 +0.1
  2. #233 Headcount 52.1 ±0
  3. #234 Agent Skills for Context Engineering 52.1 this agent
  4. #235 Han 52.0 −0.1
  5. #236 Qiushi Skill 51.9 −0.2

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Agent Skills for Context Engineering’s 52.1.

Where the 52.1 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

52.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Agent Skills for Context Engineering Agent Skills average (396 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
7.9 / 25
in line with avg 8.1
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.7 below avg 11.5
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.6 / 17
0.6 below avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
12.4 / 20
1.7 below avg 14.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
10.2 / 20
1.1 above avg 9.1

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-10-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#185 → #220)
2026-10-31
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 6pts (76 → 70)
2026-10-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 21 spots (#174 → #153)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.6/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Compare with another agent
View Agent Skills Report missing data
68.9
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#234

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-11-11 00:08 UTC · Repo last pushed 30 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-11-10

Activity & Reach

Stars
18.3k
Forks
1.5k
Last Push
2026-10-12
30 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
3
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
16
Rank Change
=
was #234

Analysis

Activity Inputs

68.9 / 100
StarsRepository reach
25.6 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
20.8 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
7.5 / 25
CommunityFork signal
14.8 / 20

Common questions about Agent Skills for Context Engineering

Public trust evidence for Agent Skills for Context Engineering is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Agent Skills for Context Engineering publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Agent Skills for Context Engineering. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Agent Skills for Context Engineering have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Agent Skills for Context Engineering has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.6/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Agent Skills for Context Engineering actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 30 days ago.
What license does Agent Skills for Context Engineering use?
Agent Skills for Context Engineering ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Agent Skills for Context Engineering's commits signed?
68% of the last 100 commits to Agent Skills for Context Engineering are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
2 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Agent Skills for Context Engineering's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, OpenAI

Maintain Agent Skills for Context Engineering?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Agent Skills for Context Engineering from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 17HVTrust 3Score 3Grade 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1Listed 1Surface 1Surface 1
2026-10-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#185 → #220)
2026-10-31
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 6pts (76 → 70)
2026-10-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 21 spots (#174 → #153)
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank rose 18 spots (#191 → #173)
2026-10-01
Rank Moved
Rank rose 31 spots (#217 → #186)
2026-10-01
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 12pts (65 → 77)
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#208 → #229)
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, OpenAI
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 54 spots (#153 → #207)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 11.0pts (39.9 → 50.9)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #153
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank rose 13 spots (#198 → #185)
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 44 spots (#148 → #192)
2026-09-09
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 3.9pts (54.2 → 50.3)
2026-09-09
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 12pts (74 → 62)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#137 → #147)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#120 → #132)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#91 → #103)
2026-08-31
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.6/10
2026-08-31
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank rose 160 spots (#251 → #91)
2026-08-31
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 31.8pts (23.3 → 55.1)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 28 spots (#223 → #251)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 29 spots (#194 → #223)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#172 → #194)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#155 → #172)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 83 spots (#72 → #155)

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 52.1 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/agent-skills-for-context-engineering.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/agent-skills-for-context-engineering)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/agent-skills-for-context-engineering"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/agent-skills-for-context-engineering.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON