Agent Governance Toolkit

AI Agent Governance Toolkit — Policy enforcement, zero-trust identity, execution sandboxing, and reliability engineering

Agent Frameworks Python Grade B Listed MIT
76.6/100
Rank #76 of 1283
Compare Agent Governance Toolkit

Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-14 · 1d ago
Recent change
No recent signal change

Is Agent Governance Toolkit safe? Agent Governance Toolkit scores 76.6/100 (Grade B), ranked #76 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 7.9/10; 92% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-14. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Agent Frameworks

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Maintainer Checklist
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
86.5
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#14

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-15 10:11 UTC · Repo last pushed yesterday

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-15

Activity & Reach

Stars
5.9k
Forks
1.0k
Last Push
2026-08-14
yesterday
Commits (4 wk)
196
Downloads (7d)
11
npm
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
95
Rank Change
▲4
was #80

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Agent Frameworks

76.6 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Agent Governance Toolkit Agent Frameworks average (118 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
14.5 / 25
6.3 above avg 8.2
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.8 below avg 11.6
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
15.2 / 17
3.6 above avg 11.6
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
19.9 / 20
5.7 above avg 14.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
10.5 / 20
0.9 below avg 11.4

Activity Inputs

86.5 / 100
StarsRepository reach
22.6 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
14.0 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
7.9 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 14, 2026
Signed Commits
92%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 5
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 5
Code-Review 10
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 10
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 6
SAST 9
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases 0
Token-Permissions 10
Vulnerabilities 0

Is Agent Governance Toolkit safe?

Public supply-chain signals for Agent Governance Toolkit are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but Agent Governance Toolkit carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.
Does Agent Governance Toolkit publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Agent Governance Toolkit. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Agent Governance Toolkit have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Agent Governance Toolkit has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 7.9/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Agent Governance Toolkit actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Agent Governance Toolkit use?
Agent Governance Toolkit ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Agent Governance Toolkit's commits signed?
92% of the last 100 commits to Agent Governance Toolkit are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Agent Governance Toolkit appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
medium confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Agent Governance Toolkit's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-06-01
Activity Resumed
Activity resumed

Maintain Agent Governance Toolkit?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Agent Governance Toolkit from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 2Listed 1Score 1HVTrust 1Grade 1Fresh 1Scorecard 1
2026-06-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#67 → #81)
2026-06-01
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 7.5/10
2026-06-01
Activity Resumed
Activity resumed
2026-06-01
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → B
2026-06-01
Rank Moved
Rank rose 114 spots (#176 → #62)
2026-06-01
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 68.6pts (0.0 → 68.6)
2026-06-01
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 84pts (0 → 84)
2026-05-31
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #176

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 76.6 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/agent-governance-toolkit.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/agent-governance-toolkit)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/agent-governance-toolkit"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/agent-governance-toolkit.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Frameworks

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON