Is Agent Governance Toolkit safe?
Agent Governance Toolkit scores 75.4/100 (Grade B), ranked #72 of 418 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types).
The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found;
OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 7.9/10;
92% of recent commits are signed;
last pushed 2026-07-17. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
Quick Trust Read
Verdict
Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.
75.4/100 · Grade B
Strongest Signal
Maintenance
19.9/20
Weakest Signal
Adoption
10.3/20
What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Maintainer Checklist
Publish provenanceAdd package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Signals refreshed2026-07-19 08:02 UTC·Repo last pushed 2 days ago
Public supply-chain signals for Agent Governance Toolkit are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but Agent Governance Toolkit carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.
Does Agent Governance Toolkit publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Agent Governance Toolkit. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Agent Governance Toolkit have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Agent Governance Toolkit has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 7.9/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Agent Governance Toolkit actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 2 day(s).
What license does Agent Governance Toolkit use?
Agent Governance Toolkit ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Agent Governance Toolkit's commits signed?
92% of the last 100 commits to Agent Governance Toolkit are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Agent Governance Toolkit appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Credential signal:
No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Marketplace
Marketplace plugin/integration surface detected.
code
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed
Detected changes to Agent Governance Toolkit's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: OpenAI
2026-06-05
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-06-01
Activity Resumed
Activity resumed
Maintain Agent Governance Toolkit?
HVTrust scores Agent Governance Toolkit from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
