Agent Gateway

Next Generation Agentic Proxy for AI Agents and MCP servers

Protocols & Tool Integration Rust Grade B Listed Apache-2.0
65.2/100
Rank #226 of 1283
Compare Agent Gateway

How does it stack up against its Protocols & Tool Integration neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-11 · 0d ago
Recent change
Rank +2

Is Agent Gateway safe? Agent Gateway scores 65.2/100 (Grade B), ranked #226 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 6.2/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-11. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Protocols & Tool Integration

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#217 → #231)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 40 spots (#165 → #205)
2026-08-07
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 6.1/10
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 6.2/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
85.1
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#20

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-11 20:02 UTC · Repo last pushed today

Activity & Reach

Stars
4.3k
Forks
718
Last Push
2026-08-11
today
Commits (4 wk)
274
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
239
Rank Change
▲5
was #231

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Protocols & Tool Integration

65.2 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Agent Gateway Protocols & Tool Integration average (57 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
12.8 / 25
4.2 above avg 8.6
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.9 below avg 11.7
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.8 / 17
2.4 above avg 11.4
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
20.0 / 20
6.2 above avg 13.8
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
8.7 / 20
1.7 below avg 10.4

Activity Inputs

85.1 / 100
StarsRepository reach
21.8 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
13.3 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
6.2 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 11, 2026
Signed Commits
100%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 5
CI-Tests 9
CII-Best-Practices 5
Code-Review 5
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 10
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 4
SAST 0
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases 0
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is Agent Gateway safe?

Agent Gateway has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Agent Gateway publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Agent Gateway. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Agent Gateway have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Agent Gateway has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 6.2/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Agent Gateway actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Agent Gateway use?
Agent Gateway ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Agent Gateway's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to Agent Gateway are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Extensions
Extension based plugin/integration surface detected.
  • browser
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Agent Gateway?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Agent Gateway from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 4Listed 1Scorecard 1
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#217 → #231)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 40 spots (#165 → #205)
2026-08-07
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 6.1/10
2026-07-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#413 → #423)
2026-07-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#386 → #406)
2026-07-14
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #386

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 65.2 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/agent-gateway.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/agent-gateway)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/agent-gateway"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/agent-gateway.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Protocols & Tool Integration

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON