Activitypub MCP
A comprehensive Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables LLMs like Claude to explore and interact with the existing Fediverse through standardized MCP tools, resources, and prompts.
Is Activitypub MCP safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
Compare Activitypub MCP
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: Activitypub MCP scores 71.5/100 (Grade B), ranked #301 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.2/10; 98% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-13. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How Activitypub MCP compares in MCP Servers
- #177 Firecrawl MCP Server 71.7 +0.2
- #178 AWS MCP Servers 71.5 ±0
- #179 Activitypub MCP 71.5 this agent
- #180 Taskade MCP 71.5 ±0
- #181 Apple Mail MCP 71.5 ±0
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Activitypub MCP’s 71.5.
Where the 71.5 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
71.5 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceActivitypub MCP MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
34.4 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about Activitypub MCP
Does Activitypub MCP publish package provenance?
Does Activitypub MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Activitypub MCP actively maintained?
What license does Activitypub MCP use?
Are Activitypub MCP's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to Activitypub MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain Activitypub MCP?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Activitypub MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/activitypub-mcp)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/activitypub-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/activitypub-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON