An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Unstructured and WrenAI, two Research & Data projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
| Signal | UnstructuredUnstructured-IO/unstructured | WrenAICanner/WrenAI |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 84.0 | 85.9 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | A | B |
| Overall rank | #28 | #24 |
| Rank in Research & Data | #3 | #2 |
| GitHub stars | 15.1k | 15.8k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.7 / 10 | 6.0 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | NOASSERTION |
| Downloads | 1.2M/wk | 181/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 20.9 | 20.0 |
| Identity & provenance / 20 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 14.2 | 13.6 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 13.4 | 19.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 18.1 | 13.1 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | — |
| External providers | 6 — Amazon Bedrock, OpenAI, Pinecone, … | 2 — Amazon Bedrock, Postgres |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | plugins | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →