Vibe-Trading vs WrenAI
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Vibe-Trading and WrenAI, two Research & Data projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
WrenAI leads on trust — 86.2/100 (Grade A) vs 62.5/100 (Grade C), a 23.7-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | Vibe-TradingHKUDS/Vibe-Trading | WrenAICanner/WrenAI |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 62.5 | 86.2 |
| Evidence grade | C | A |
| Coverage grade | C | B |
| Overall rank | #185 | #31 |
| Rank in Research & Data | #8 | #2 |
| GitHub stars | 29.6k | 16.8k |
| Last updated | today | 1d ago |
| Build provenance | No | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.1 / 10 | 6.1 / 10 |
| License | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Downloads | — | 145/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 8.2 | 20.1 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 12.8 | 13.7 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 19.9 |
| Adoption / 20 | 10.7 | 13.0 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Declared |
| External providers | 1 — OpenAI | 3 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Postgres |
| Requires API keys | Yes | No |
| Plugin surface | marketplace | plugins |
| Provenance drift | — | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →