RegistryCompare › Unstructured vs Vibe-Trading

Unstructured vs Vibe-Trading

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Unstructured and Vibe-Trading, two Research & Data projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Unstructured leads on trust — 85.9/100 (Grade A) vs 63.5/100 (Grade C), a 22.4-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal UnstructuredUnstructured-IO/unstructured Vibe-TradingHKUDS/Vibe-Trading
HVTrust score 85.9 63.5
Evidence grade A C
Coverage grade A C
Overall rank #45 #266
Rank in Research & Data #3 #7
GitHub stars 15.3k 30.8k
Last updated 2d ago today
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 6.7 / 10 5.5 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 1.2M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 20.9 8.7
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 14.2 13.2
Maintenance / 20 13.4 20.0
Adoption / 20 18.1 10.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 7 — Amazon Bedrock, Google Gemini, OpenAI, … 3 — DeepSeek, OpenAI, OpenRouter
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → Unstructured profile Vibe-Trading profile More Research & Data →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →