RegistryCompare › Unstructured vs Vibe-Trading

Unstructured vs Vibe-Trading

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Unstructured and Vibe-Trading, two Research & Data projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Unstructured leads on trust — 87.5/100 (Grade A) vs 62.2/100 (Grade C), a 25.3-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal UnstructuredUnstructured-IO/unstructured Vibe-TradingHKUDS/Vibe-Trading
HVTrust score 87.5 62.2
Evidence grade A C
Coverage grade A C
Overall rank #41 #544
Rank in Research & Data #3 #10
GitHub stars 15.4k 33.7k
Last updated 4d ago 1d ago
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 6.6 / 10 5.8 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 564k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 20.7 7.2
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 14.1 13.4
Maintenance / 20 16.4 19.9
Adoption / 20 17.7 10.9
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 7 — Amazon Bedrock, Google Gemini, OpenAI, … 3 — DeepSeek, OpenAI, OpenRouter
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → Unstructured profile Vibe-Trading profile More Research & Data →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →