Supabase MCP Server vs Windows MCP
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Supabase MCP Server and Windows MCP, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Supabase MCP Server leads on trust — 88.9/100 (Grade A) vs 85.1/100 (Grade A), a 3.8-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | Supabase MCP Serversupabase/mcp | Windows MCPCursorTouch/Windows-MCP |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 88.9 | 85.1 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #24 | #50 |
| Rank in MCP Servers | #2 | #4 |
| GitHub stars | 2.9k | 7.1k |
| Last updated | today | 1d ago |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.5 / 10 | 6.2 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Downloads | 89k/wk | 4k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 20.0 | 17.8 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 14.0 | 13.8 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 17.6 | 16.4 |
| Adoption / 20 | 14.9 | 14.1 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | 1 — Supabase | — |
| Requires API keys | No | Yes |
| Plugin surface | plugins | — |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →