RegistryCompare › Stripe Agent Toolkit vs Supabase MCP Server

Stripe Agent Toolkit vs Supabase MCP Server

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Stripe Agent Toolkit and Supabase MCP Server, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Supabase MCP Server leads on trust — 88.9/100 (Grade A) vs 84.3/100 (Grade A), a 4.6-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Stripe Agent Toolkitstripe/ai Supabase MCP Serversupabase/mcp
HVTrust score 84.3 88.9
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #57 #24
Rank in MCP Servers #5 #2
GitHub stars 1.8k 2.9k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 6.1 / 10 6.5 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 16k/wk 89k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 17.6 20.0
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.7 14.0
Maintenance / 20 16.9 17.6
Adoption / 20 13.4 14.9
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI 1 — Supabase
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Stripe Agent Toolkit profile Supabase MCP Server profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →