RegistryCompare › SearXNG Search vs Supabase MCP Server

SearXNG Search vs Supabase MCP Server

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of SearXNG Search and Supabase MCP Server, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

SearXNG Search and Supabase MCP Server are tied on HVTrust at 88.8/100. Full breakdown below.
Signal SearXNG Searchihor-sokoliuk/mcp-searxng Supabase MCP Serversupabase/mcp
HVTrust score 88.8 88.8
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #18 #19
Rank in MCP Servers #2 #3
GitHub stars 1.2k 2.9k
Last updated 2d ago today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 8.7 / 10 6.5 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 15k/wk 102k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 18.4 19.9
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 15.9 14.0
Maintenance / 20 18.8 17.5
Adoption / 20 12.9 15.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 1 — Supabase
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → SearXNG Search profile Supabase MCP Server profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →