Registry › Compare › ReMe vs Vespa

ReMe vs Vespa

Both are Grade A and 2.4 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. ReMe leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency; Vespa leads on adoption and maintenance, and rests on broader evidence. Note: ReMe's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types.

A ReMe 88.6

ReMe: Memory Management Kit for Agents - Remember Me, Refine Me.

agentscope-ai/ReMe · #31 overall · #1 Memory & Knowledge · coverage B (3/5)

Choose ReMe if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

+3.0Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 61%
+0.6Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.1 against 6.3

A Vespa 86.2

The AI search platform

vespa-engine/vespa · #64 overall · #5 Memory & Knowledge · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Vespa if adoption and maintenance matter most.

+2.6Adoption: 193k weekly downloads against 7.9k
+1.2Maintenance
A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3

Where they differ

21.4

Safety / IntegrityReMe +3.0

18.4

14.5

TransparencyReMe +0.6

13.9

18.7

MaintenanceVespa +1.2

19.9

13.7

AdoptionVespa +2.6

16.3

+2.3

Runtime calibrationReMe +2.6

-0.3

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of ReMe and Vespa, two Memory & Knowledge projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	ReMeagentscope-ai/ReMe	Vespavespa-engine/vespa
HVTrust score	88.6	86.2
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	A
Overall rank	#31	#64
Rank in Memory & Knowledge	#1	#5
GitHub stars	3.5k	7.1k
Last updated	1d ago	1d ago
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	7.1 / 10	6.3 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	Apache-2.0
Downloads	8k/wk	193k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	21.4	18.4
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	14.5	13.9
Maintenance / 20	18.7	19.9
Adoption / 20	13.7	16.3
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	—
External providers	2 — Anthropic, OpenAI	—
Requires API keys	Yes	No
Plugin surface	plugins	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	Unknown

Open in the live compare tool → ReMe profile Vespa profile More Memory & Knowledge →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →