RegistryCompare › ReMe vs Vespa

ReMe vs Vespa

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of ReMe and Vespa, two Memory & Knowledge projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Vespa leads on trust — 86.2/100 (Grade A) vs 74.7/100 (Grade B), a 11.5-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal ReMeagentscope-ai/ReMe Vespavespa-engine/vespa
HVTrust score 74.7 86.2
Evidence grade B A
Coverage grade B A
Overall rank #92 #41
Rank in Memory & Knowledge #8 #3
GitHub stars 3.3k 7.0k
Last updated 2d ago 1d ago
Build provenance No Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10 5.8 / 10
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Downloads 128k/wk 2.3M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 12.0 17.5
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.3 13.4
Maintenance / 20 19.1 19.9
Adoption / 20 15.3 17.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 2 — Anthropic, OpenAI
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Match Unknown
Open in the live compare tool → ReMe profile Vespa profile More Memory & Knowledge →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →