REA vs Snyk Agent Scan
REA leads on trust: 89.8/100 (Grade A) against 63.4/100 (Grade C), a 26.4-point gap. REA leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance, and rests on broader evidence.
Reverse engineer anything with agents, from app behavior down to native binaries.
Choose REA if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.
- +8.6Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 6.6 against 5.7
- +7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
- +5.2Adoption: 449.9k GitHub stars against 3.2k
- +2.1Maintenance
Security scanner for AI agents, MCP servers and agent skills.
Snyk Agent Scan doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.
Where they differ
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of REA and Snyk Agent Scan, two Security & Guardrails projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | REAmorluto/rea | Snyk Agent Scansnyk/agent-scan |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 89.8 | 63.4 |
| Evidence grade | A | C |
| Coverage grade | B | C |
| Overall rank | #31 | #587 |
| Rank in Security & Guardrails | #2 | #8 |
| GitHub stars | 449.9k | 3.2k |
| Last updated | 1d ago | 1d ago |
| Build provenance | Yes | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.6 / 10 | 5.7 / 10 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | — | — |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 20.7 | 12.1 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 14.1 | 13.3 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.9 | 17.8 |
| Adoption / 20 | 13.6 | 8.4 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | 1 — Anthropic | 1 — Anthropic |
| Requires API keys | No | Yes |
| Plugin surface | plugins | — |
| Provenance drift | Match | — |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →