Qwen Audio Agent vs Rasa
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Qwen Audio Agent and Rasa, two Voice & Conversational projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Qwen Audio Agent leads on trust — 71.2/100 (Grade B) vs 59.4/100 (Grade C), a 11.8-point gap. Note: Qwen Audio Agent's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | Qwen Audio AgentQwenAudio/qwen-audio-agent | RasaRasaHQ/rasa |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 71.2 | 59.4 |
| Evidence grade | B | C |
| Coverage grade | B | A |
| Overall rank | #132 | #346 |
| Rank in Voice & Conversational | #3 | #6 |
| GitHub stars | 2.2k | 21.3k |
| Last updated | 2d ago | 24d ago |
| Build provenance | Yes | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | — | 5.2 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | 1k/wk | 58k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 9.6 | 6.5 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 8.5 | 12.9 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.9 | 10.4 |
| Adoption / 20 | 12.2 | 16.7 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Declared | — |
| External providers | — | 3 — Amazon Bedrock, Postgres, Redis |
| Requires API keys | Yes | No |
| Plugin surface | — | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →