Registry › Compare › Qwen Audio Agent vs Rasa

Qwen Audio Agent vs Rasa

Qwen Audio Agent leads on trust: 86.7/100 (Grade A) against 56.0/100 (Grade C), a 30.7-point gap. Qwen Audio Agent leads on supply-chain integrity and maintenance; Rasa leads on adoption and rests on broader evidence. Note: Qwen Audio Agent's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types.

A realtime voice runtime that keeps Agents talking, working, and present. Real-time Voice Runtime for AI Agents

QwenAudio/qwen-audio-agent · #80 overall · #3 Voice & Conversational · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Qwen Audio Agent if supply-chain integrity and maintenance matter most.

  • +13.7Maintenance: last push 3d ago, against 114d ago
  • +10.8Safety / Integrity: 90% of recent commits signed, against 59%
  • +7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
  • +1.2Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.6 against 5.2
C Rasa 56.0

💬 Open source machine learning framework to automate text- and voice-based conversations: NLU, dialogue management, connect to Slack, Facebook, and more - Create chatbots and voice assistants

RasaHQ/rasa · #826 overall · #10 Voice & Conversational · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Rasa if adoption matters most.

  • +4.3Adoption: 31.1k weekly downloads against 536
  • A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3

Where they differ

20.2
Safety / IntegrityQwen Audio Agent +10.8
9.4
18.0
Identity / ProvenanceQwen Audio Agent +7.2
10.8
14.1
TransparencyQwen Audio Agent +1.2
12.9
18.1
MaintenanceQwen Audio Agent +13.7
4.4
12.1
AdoptionRasa +4.3
16.4
+4.2
Runtime calibrationQwen Audio Agent +2.1
+2.1

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Qwen Audio Agent and Rasa, two Voice & Conversational projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal Qwen Audio AgentQwenAudio/qwen-audio-agent RasaRasaHQ/rasa
HVTrust score 86.7 56.0
Evidence grade A C
Coverage grade B A
Overall rank #80 #826
Rank in Voice & Conversational #3 #10
GitHub stars 3.2k 21.4k
Last updated 3d ago 114d ago
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 6.6 / 10 5.2 / 10
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Downloads 536/wk 31k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 20.2 9.4
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 14.1 12.9
Maintenance / 20 18.1 4.4
Adoption / 20 12.1 16.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented —
External providers — 3 — Amazon Bedrock, Postgres, Redis
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface — plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Qwen Audio Agent profile Rasa profile More Voice & Conversational →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →