Registry › Compare › Qwen Audio Agent vs Rasa

Qwen Audio Agent vs Rasa

Qwen Audio Agent leads on trust: 86.0/100 (Grade A) against 59.3/100 (Grade C), a 26.7-point gap. Qwen Audio Agent leads on maintenance and supply-chain integrity; Rasa leads on adoption and rests on broader evidence. Note: Qwen Audio Agent's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types.

A Qwen Audio Agent 86.0

A realtime voice runtime that keeps Agents talking, working, and present. Real-time Voice Runtime for AI Agents

QwenAudio/qwen-audio-agent · #71 overall · #2 Voice & Conversational · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Qwen Audio Agent if maintenance and supply-chain integrity matter most.

+12.4Maintenance: last push 3d ago, against 69d ago
+9.5Safety / Integrity: 91% of recent commits signed, against 59%
+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none

C Rasa 59.3

💬 Open source machine learning framework to automate text- and voice-based conversations: NLU, dialogue management, connect to Slack, Facebook, and more - Create chatbots and voice assistants

RasaHQ/rasa · #653 overall · #6 Voice & Conversational · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Rasa if adoption matters most.

+5.2Adoption: 53.7k weekly downloads against 247
A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3

Where they differ

18.9

Safety / IntegrityQwen Audio Agent +9.5

9.4

18.0

Identity / ProvenanceQwen Audio Agent +7.2

10.8

13.2

TransparencyQwen Audio Agent +0.3

12.9

19.8

MaintenanceQwen Audio Agent +12.4

7.4

11.5

AdoptionRasa +5.2

16.7

+4.6

Runtime calibrationQwen Audio Agent +2.5

+2.1

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Qwen Audio Agent and Rasa, two Voice & Conversational projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Qwen Audio AgentQwenAudio/qwen-audio-agent	RasaRasaHQ/rasa
HVTrust score	86.0	59.3
Evidence grade	A	C
Coverage grade	B	A
Overall rank	#71	#653
Rank in Voice & Conversational	#2	#6
GitHub stars	2.8k	21.3k
Last updated	3d ago	69d ago
Build provenance	Yes	No
OSSF Scorecard	5.5 / 10	5.2 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	Apache-2.0
Downloads	247/wk	54k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	18.9	9.4
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	10.8
Transparency / 17	13.2	12.9
Maintenance / 20	19.8	7.4
Adoption / 20	11.5	16.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	—
External providers	—	3 — Amazon Bedrock, Postgres, Redis
Requires API keys	Yes	No
Plugin surface	—	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Qwen Audio Agent profile Rasa profile More Voice & Conversational →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →