Playwright MCP vs XcodeBuildMCP
Playwright MCP leads on trust: 91.5/100 (Grade A) against 79.1/100 (Grade B), a 12.4-point gap. Playwright MCP leads on maintenance and adoption.
Playwright MCP server
Choose Playwright MCP if maintenance and adoption matter most.
- +4.4Adoption: 6.5M weekly downloads against 66.5k
- +3.3Maintenance
- +2.8Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 64%
- +0.7Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 5.9 against 5.1
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server and CLI that provides tools for agent use when working on iOS and macOS projects.
XcodeBuildMCP doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.
Where they differ
1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Playwright MCP and XcodeBuildMCP, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | Playwright MCPmicrosoft/playwright-mcp | XcodeBuildMCPgetsentry/MobileBuildMCP |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 91.5 | 79.1 |
| Evidence grade | A | B |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #15 | #178 |
| Rank in MCP Servers | #2 | #92 |
| GitHub stars | 38.1k | 6.5k |
| Last updated | 5d ago | 4d ago |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.9 / 10 | 5.1 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Downloads | 6.5M/wk | 66k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 19.9 | 17.1 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.5 | 12.8 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 16.9 | 13.6 |
| Adoption / 20 | 20.0 | 15.6 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | — | — |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | — | — |
| Provenance drift | Match | Unknown |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →