Plannotator vs Trailofbits Skills
Both score 66.7/100, so choose on what you weigh most. Plannotator leads on maintenance; Trailofbits Skills leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency.
Annotate and review coding agent plans and code diffs visually, share with your team, send feedback to agents with one click.
Choose Plannotator if maintenance matters most.
- +2.5Maintenance
Trail of Bits Claude Code skills for security research, vulnerability detection, and audit workflows
Choose Trailofbits Skills if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.
- +1.1Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 93%
- +0.6Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.6 against 7.0
Where they differ
1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Plannotator and Trailofbits Skills, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | Plannotatorbacknotprop/plannotator | Trailofbits Skillstrailofbits/skills |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 66.7 | 66.7 |
| Evidence grade | B | B |
| Coverage grade | C | C |
| Overall rank | #49 | #48 |
| Rank in Agent Skills | #49 | #48 |
| GitHub stars | 8.9k | 7.3k |
| Last updated | 1d ago | 1d ago |
| Build provenance | No | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 7.0 / 10 | 7.6 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | CC-BY-SA-4.0 |
| Downloads | — | — |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 13.4 | 14.5 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 14.4 | 15.0 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.9 | 17.4 |
| Adoption / 20 | 9.5 | 9.3 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | — |
| External providers | 1 — Anthropic | 1 — Anthropic |
| Requires API keys | Yes | No |
| Plugin surface | plugins | plugins |
| Provenance drift | — | — |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →